David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2):423-432 (2006)
We investigated how motor agency in the voluntary control of body movement influences body awareness. In the Rubber Hand Illusion , synchronous tactile stimulation of a rubber hand and the participant’s hand leads to a feeling of the rubber hand being incorporated in the participant’s own body. One quantifiable behavioural correlate of the illusion is an induced shift in the perceived location of the participant’s hand towards the rubber hand. Previous studies showed that the induced changes in body awareness are local and fragmented: the proprioceptive drift is largely restricted to the stimulated finger. In the present study, we investigated whether active and passive movements, rather than tactile stimulation, would lead to similarly fragmented body awareness. Participants watched a projected image of their hand under three conditions: active finger movement, passive finger movement, and tactile stimulation. Visual feedback was either synchronous or asynchronous with respect to stimulation of the hand. A significant overall RHI, defined as greater drifts following synchronous than asynchronous stimulation, was found in all cases. However, the distribution of the RHI across stimulated and non-stimulated fingers depended on the kind of stimulation. Localised proprioceptive drifts, specific to the stimulated finger, were found for tactile and passive stimulation. Conversely, during active movement of a single digit, the proprioceptive drifts were not localised to that digit, but were spread across the whole hand. Whereas a purely proprioceptive sense of body-ownership is local and fragmented, the motor sense of agency integrates distinct body-parts into a coherent, unified awareness of the body
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Shaun Gallagher (2000). Philosophical Conceptions of the Self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (1):14-21.
Patrick Haggard, Sam Clark & Jeri Kalogeras (2002). Voluntary Action and Conscious Awareness. Nature Neuroscience 5 (4):382-385.
Manos Tsakiris, Patrick Haggard, Nicolas Franck, Nelly Mainy & Angela Sirigu (2005). A Specific Role for Efferent Information in Self-Recognition. Cognition 96 (3):215-231.
Shaun Gallagher (2000). Self-Reference and Schizophrenia: A Cognitive Model of Immunity to Error Through Misidentification. In Dan Zahavi (ed.), Exploring the Self: Philosophical and Psychopathological Perspectives on Self-Experience. John Benjamins 203--239.
Frederique de Vignemont (2005). Body Mereology. In G. Knoblich, I. M. Thornton, M. Grosjean & M. Shiffrar (eds.), Human Body Perception From the Inside Out. Oxford University Press
Citations of this work BETA
M. Synofzik, G. Vosgerau & A. Newen (2008). Beyond the Comparator Model: A Multi-Factorial Two-Step Account of Agency. Consciousness and Cognition 17 (1):219-239.
Konstantina Kilteni, Antonella Maselli, Konrad P. Kording & Mel Slater (2015). Over My Fake Body: Body Ownership Illusions for Studying the Multisensory Basis of Own-Body Perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
Evan Thompson & Mog Stapleton (2009). Making Sense of Sense-Making: Reflections on Enactive and Extended Mind Theories. Topoi 28 (1):23-30.
Matthew R. Longo, Friederike Schüür, Marjolein P. M. Kammers, Manos Tsakiris & Patrick Haggard (2008). What is Embodiment? A Psychometric Approach. Cognition 107 (3):978-998.
Frédérique De Vignemont (2010). Embodiment, Ownership and Disownership. Consciousness and Cognition 20 (1):1-12.
Similar books and articles
Helena De Preester & Manos Tsakiris (2009). Body-Extension Versus Body-Incorporation: Is There a Need for a Body-Model? [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (3):307-319.
Frederique de Vignemont (2007). Habeas Corpus: The Sense of Ownership of One's Own Body. Mind and Language 22 (4):427-449.
John Schwenkler (2013). The Objects of Bodily Awareness. Philosophical Studies 162 (2):465-472.
Frédérique de Vignemont (2011). A Self for the Body. Metaphilosophy 42 (3):230-247.
Alastair V. Campbell (2009). The Body in Bioethics. Routledge-Cavendish.
Glenn Carruthers (2009). Is the Body Schema Sufficient for the Sense of Embodiment? An Alternative to de Vignmont's Model. Philosophical Psychology 22 (2):123-142.
Frederique de Vignemont (2012). Habeas Corpus: poczucie własności swojego ciała. Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 3 (T).
M. Tsakiris, S. SchutzboSbach & S. Gallagher (2007). On Agency and Body-Ownership: Phenomenological and Neurocognitive Reflections. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (3):645-660.
Brian McElwee (2010). The Appeal of Self-Ownership. Social Theory and Practice 36 (2):213-232.
David Morris (2006). Ecstatic Body, Ecstatic Nature: Perception as Breaking with the World. Chiasmi International 8:201-217.
Benny Shanon (2008). Mind-Body, Body-Mind: Two Distinct Problems. Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.
Michael G. F. Martin (1995). Bodily Awareness: A Sense of Ownership. In Jose Luis Bermudez, Anthony J. Marcel & Naomi M. Eilan (eds.), The Body and the Self. MIT Press 267â289.
Londa L. Schiebinger (ed.) (2000). Feminism and the Body. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads22 ( #178,006 of 1,911,370 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #455,910 of 1,911,370 )
How can I increase my downloads?