David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 15 (8):851 - 861 (1996)
Two contrasting types of individuals were each predicted to agree, for different reasons, that conventional ethical standards of society need not be upheld if organizational interests appear to demand otherwise. The hypotheses were investigated using questionnaire responses from two samples (employed and student, total N=308). Clear support was obtained for the prediction that individuals inclined toward self-interest and behavior counter to conventional standards would agree with the preceding position. Partial support was obtained for the hypothesis that individuals who simply feel obligated to support an employing organization would also agree. While the latter's perspective may be somewhat narrow or perhaps even cynical, they do not seem to reflect the self-interest profile of the first group. This study also extends the groundbreaking work of Froelich and Kottke by exploring individual difference correlates of their promising ethics scale assessing the extent of agreement that organizational interests legitimately supersede more conventional ethical standards.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Neil A. Granitz & James C. Ward (2001). Actual and Perceived Sharing of Ethical Reasoning and Moral Intent Among in-Group and Out-Group Members. Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):299 - 322.
Celia Moore (2008). Moral Disengagement in Processes of Organizational Corruption. Journal of Business Ethics 80 (1):129 - 139.
Wayne O'Donohue & Lindsay Nelson (2009). The Role of Ethical Values in an Expanded Psychological Contract. Journal of Business Ethics 90 (2):251 - 263.
Wayne O.’Donohue & Lindsay Nelson (2009). The Role of Ethical Values in an Expanded Psychological Contract. Journal of Business Ethics 90 (2):251 - 263.
Susan Key (1999). Organizational Ethical Culture: Real or Imagined? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 20 (3):217 - 225.
Randi L. Sims & Thomas L. Keon (1999). Determinants of Ethical Decision Making: The Relationship of the Perceived Organizational Environment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 19 (4):393 - 401.
Scott J. Reynolds (2003). Perceptions of Organizational Ethicality: Do Inflated Perceptions of Self Lead to Inflated Perceptions of the Organization? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 42 (3):253 - 266.
Janie M. Harden Fritz, Ronald C. Arnett & Michele Conkel (1999). Organizational Ethical Standards and Organizational Commitment. Journal of Business Ethics 20 (4):289 - 299.
E. Sharon Mason & Peter E. Mudrack (1997). Do Complex Moral Reasoners Experience Greater Ethical Work Conflict? Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1311-1318.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #111,268 of 1,014,520 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #65,013 of 1,014,520 )
How can I increase my downloads?