David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 20 (3):756-767 (2011)
Contextual regularities, that is, objects’ tendency to appear with certain other objects, facilitate the processing of visual scenes and confer contextually incongruent objects with a special attentional status. This study was aimed at investigating the mechanisms underlying this attentional advantage using Binocular Rivalry . In two experiments, congruent and incongruent images were pitted against each other, yielding a version of BR in which two objects rival within a given scene. Incongruent objects predominated in awareness longer than congruent ones. This effect stemmed from the fact that their dominance epochs lasted longer on the average than those of congruent objects, suggesting a difficulty to disengage attention from such objects. On the other hand, no support was found for the notion that incongruent objects also attract attention
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Daniel J. Simons & Ronald A. Rensink (2005). Change Blindness: Past, Present, and Future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (1):16-20.
Ronald A. Rensink, J. Kevin O'Regan & James J. Clark (1997). To See or Not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes. Psychological Science 8:368-373.
Daniel J. Simons & Daniel T. Levin (1997). Change Blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (1):241-82.
D. L. Sheinberg & Nikos K. Logothetis (1997). The Role of Temporal Cortical Areas in Perceptual Organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Usa 94:3408-3413.
David A. Leopold & Nikos K. Logothetis (1999). Multistable Phenomena: Changing Views in Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (7):254-264.
Citations of this work BETA
Liad Mudrik, Nathan Faivre & Christof Koch (2014). Information Integration Without Awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18 (9):488-496.
Similar books and articles
R. R. Blake (2001). A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies. Brain and Mind 2 (1):5-38.
Frank Tong (2001). Competing Theories of Binocular Rivalry: A Possible Resolution. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 2 (1):55-83.
John D. Pettigrew (2001). Searching for the Switch: Neural Bases for Perceptual Rivalry Alternations. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 2 (1):85-118.
Robert P. O'Shea & Paul M. Corballis (2001). Binocular Rivalry Between Complex Stimuli in Split-Brain Observers. Brain and Mind 2 (1):151-160.
Diego J. Cosmelli & Evan Thompson (2007). Mountains and Valleys: Binocular Rivalry and the Flow of Experience. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (3):623-641.
Sam M. Doesburg, Keiichi Kitajo & Lawrence M. Ward (2005). Increased Gamma-Band Synchrony Precedes Switching of Conscious Perceptual Objects in Binocular Rivalry. Neuroreport 16 (11):1139-1142.
T. Kobayashi & K. Kato (2002). Reactivity of Human Cortical Oscillations Reflecting Conscious Perception in Binocular Rivalry. In Kunio Yasue, Marj Jibu & Tarcisio Della Senta (eds.), No Matter, Never Mind. John Benjamins 33--261.
Ramesh Srinivasan & Sanja Petrovic (2006). Meg Phase Follows Conscious Perception During Binocular Rivalry Induced by Visual Stream Segregation. Cerebral Cortex 16 (5):597-608.
S. M. Miller (2001). Binocular Rivalry and the Cerebral Hemispheres, with a Note on the Correlates and Constitution of Visual Consciousness. Brain and Mind 2 (1):119-49.
Nikos K. Logothetis (1999). Binocular Rivalry: A Window Onto Consciousness. Scientific American.
Fumihiko Taya & Ken Mogi (2005). Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of the Visual System Revealed in Binocular Rivalry. Neuroscience Letters 381 (1-2):63-68.
Nikos K. Logothetis, David A. Leopold & D. L. Sheinberg (1996). What is Rivalling During Binocular Rivalry? Nature 30 (6575):621-624.
B. B. Breese (1909). Can Binocular Rivalry Be Suppressed by Practise? Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 6 (25):686-687.
P. Livet (2007). Comment on “Mountains and Valleys: Binocular Rivalry and the Flow of Experience”☆. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (3):642-644.
Added to index2011-08-17
Total downloads8 ( #276,630 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?