David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind 78 (309):129-131 (1969)
In this note i argue against harold n. lee's assertion ("mind," october, 1965) that resolution of zeno's paradoxes is closely connected with the modern mathematical distinction between density and continuity. zeno's paradoxes would arise as much if space or time is dense as they do if it is continuous. in fact the paradoxes only arise if one combines a mathematical analysis of space and time with a non-mathematical conception of motion
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Wesley C. Salmon (ed.) (1970). Zeno's Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill.
Peter Lynds (forthcoming). Zeno's Paradoxes: A Timely Solution. PhilSci Archive.
Adolf Grünbaum (1970). Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes of Motion. In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill 200--250.
Adolf Grünbaum (1955). Modern Science and the Refutation of the Paradoxes of Zeno. In Wesley C. Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Bobbs-Merrill 164--175.
Gary Mar & Paul St Denis (1999). What the Liar Taught Achilles. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):29-46.
Alba Papa-Grimaldi (1996). Why Mathematical Solutions of Zeno's Paradoxes Miss the Point: Zeno's One and Many Relation and Parmenides' Prohibition. Review of Metaphysics 50 (2):299 - 314.
Nicholas Huggett (forthcoming). Zeno's Paradoxes. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (Ed.).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #203,640 of 1,911,757 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,113 of 1,911,757 )
How can I increase my downloads?