|Abstract||This study is an exploration of the place of perspectivism in the philosophy of Henri Bergson. His work is compared with that of Thomas Nagel in terms of the mutual concern of these two philosophers to reconcile our increasingly objecti vist and impersonal understanding of reality with the perspectival apprehension of the world that living and conscious beings instantiate. It argues that Bergson's philosophy of time holds the key both to comprehending and to balancing the demands made upon us by these conflicting interests. It is seldom that Bergson's name is thought of in this connection, his concerns more often than not being identified with some thesis about time, movement, or vital forces. One purpose of the present work, therefore, is to contest this interpretive slant, not merely by offering an alternative image of Bergson, but also by critically exploring his employment of perspectivism (both positive and negative). We pursue this goal through the double strategy of both unravelling the inconsistencies in Bergson's· treatment of perspective and separating his own argument from the multitude of myths, opinions, and interpretations, sympathetic and unsympathetic, that have arisen around what is currently understood by "Bergsonism". In retrieving his thought from such philosophical ghettoes as "vitalism," "spiritualism," and "psychologism," we will argue for a Bergsonian perspectivism which ultimately resides in a thesis propounding the primacy of perception. One consequence of this is the demotion of memory's importance within his thought. Not that the orthodox image of Bergsonism that retains the privileged place of memory is wrong. Rather, we argue that there is enough in Bergson's peculiar picture of perception to obviate the need for memory in his philosophy, and, moreover, that it is actually more Bergsonian that memory should be so discharged|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Leonard Lawlor (2003). The Ontology of Memory: Bergson's Reversal of Platonism. Epoché 8 (1):69-102.
Alia Al-Saji (2004). The Memory of Another Past: Bergson, Deleuze and a New Theory of Time. Continental Philosophy Review 37 (2):203-239.
Wahida Khandker (2013). The Idea of Will and Organic Evolution in Bergson's Philosophy of Life. Continental Philosophy Review 46 (1):57-74.
Heath Massey (2010). On the Verge of Being and Time: Before Heidegger's Dismissal of Bergson. Philosophy Today 54 (2):138-52.
Jesse Matz (2011). 'Quelque Romancier Hardi': The Literary Bergsonist. The European Legacy 16 (7):937 - 951.
Michael Kelly (2010). A Phenomenological (Husserlian) Defense of Bergson's “Idealistic Concession”. Epoché 14 (2):399-415.
John Mullarkey (2004). Forget the Virtual: Bergson, Actualism, and the Refraction of Reality. Continental Philosophy Review 37 (4):469-493.
Robin Durie (2010). Wandering Among Shadows: The Discordance of Time in Levinas and Bergson. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (4):371-392.
Jonathan Sholl (2012). Thought and Repetition in Bergson and Deleuze. Deleuze Studies 6 (4):544-563.
Stephen E. Robbins (2006). Bergson and the Holographic Theory of Mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (3-4).
Sarah Richmond (2007). Sartre and Bergson: A Disagreement About Nothingness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (1):77 – 95.
F. C. T. Moore (1996). Bergson: Thinking Backwards. Cambridge University Press.
Rudolf Bernet (2005). A Present Folded Back on the Past (Bergson). Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):55-76.
Geoffrey Callaghan (forthcoming). Bergson and Athleticism. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy:1-14.
Added to index2012-01-10
Total downloads2 ( #232,316 of 549,013 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?