David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (2):196-217 (2009)
Many commentators have argued that Mill's Liberty Principle is most reasonably construed as limiting social interference to cases where an individual's action either harms or increases the probability of harm to others. The convention when it comes to understanding harm seems to be to build into the concept a normative component such that what it means to harm someone is that we have wronged them in some important respect. But such an understanding of harm will vary depending upon which particular moral framework is adopted, and as such, will not achieve the sort of neutrality necessary for the Liberty Principle to be accepted by a liberal society. However, I am unconvinced that we need to appeal to moral concepts in order to fully analyze Mill's Liberty Principle and the ultimate aim of this article is to sketch an account of how his principle could be non-normatively explicated
|Keywords||MILL LIBERTY UTILITARIANISM HARM RIGHTS|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard Arneson, Listed Below Are Some Examples That Mil Introduces to Help Interpret His Liberty Principle and to Illustrate its Application.
John Kilcullen (1981). Mill on Duty and Liberty. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (3):290 – 300.
Ted Honderich (1967). Mill on Liberty. Inquiry 10 (1-4):292 – 297.
Jonathan Riley (2005). J. S. Mill's Doctrine of Freedom of Expression. Utilitas 17 (2):147-179.
André Krom (2011). The Harm Principle as a Mid-Level Principle? Three Problems From the Context of Infectious Disease Control. Bioethics 25 (8):437-444.
Jonathan M. Riley (2009). Liberty as a Right. The Philosophers' Magazine 46 (46):46-52.
Preston King (2000). Liberty: All Coherence Gone? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (4):25-48.
Janos Kis (2013). Berlin's Two Concepts of Positive Liberty. European Journal of Political Theory 12 (1):31-48.
Bruce Jennings (2009). Public Health and Liberty: Beyond the Millian Paradigm. Public Health Ethics 2 (2):123-134.
Jan Narveson (2011). Response. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):259-272.
Nils Holtug (2002). The Harm Principle. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
Jovan Babic (2006). Self-Regarding / Other-Regarding Acts: Some Remarks. Prolegomena 5 (2):193-207.
Lawrence Crocker (1980). Positive Liberty: An Essay in Normative Political Philosophy. Distributor, Kluwer Boston.
David Lyons (1994). Rights, Welfare, and Mill's Moral Theory. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads23 ( #164,316 of 1,796,306 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #348,557 of 1,796,306 )
How can I increase my downloads?