Is algebraic lorentz-covariant quantum field theory stochastic Einstein local?

Philosophy of Science 61 (3):457-474 (1994)
The general context of this paper is the locality problem in quantum theory. In a recent issue of this journal, Redei (1991) offered a proof of the proposition that algebraic Lorentz-covariant quantum field theory is past stochastic Einstein local. We show that Redei's proof is either spurious or circular, and that it contains two deductive fallacies. Furthermore, we prove that the mentioned theory meets the stronger condition of stochastic Haag locality
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289814
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Jeremy Butterfield (2007). Stochastic Einstein Locality Revisited. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):805 - 867.
Gábor Hofer-Szabó (2015). On the Relation Between the Probabilistic Characterization of the Common Cause and Bell׳s Notion of Local Causality. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 49:32-41.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

27 ( #114,246 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #231,316 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.