Innate enlightenment and no-thought: A response to the critical buddhist position on zen
|Abstract||Prof. Matsumoto Shirō and his colleague, Prof. Hakamaya Noriaki, have together produced a number of lengthy essays on a theme called hihan bukkyō (批判仏教), in English, "Critical Buddhism."1 At the core of their project is the conviction that the concepts of tathāgatagarbha and innate enlightenment (本覺思想) are alien to Buddhism, due to the fact that those concepts imply a belief in a hypostasized self--a type of atman, which Buddhism originally and distinctively sought to refute through the conceptual framework of pratītya-samutpāda (dependent origination).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Masao Abe (1995). Buddhism and Interfaith Dialogue: Part One of a Two-Volume Sequel to Zen and Western Thought. University of Hawaiʻi Press.
Michael P. Levine (2003). Can the Concept of Enlightenment Evolve? Asian Philosophy 13 (2 & 3):115 – 129.
Christopher Ives (2009). Imperial-Way Zen: Ichikawa Hakugen's Critique and Lingering Questions for Buddhist Ethics. University of Hawai'i Press.
Hsin-Chun Huang (2009). Epistemological Approach to Chán Enlightenment: A Philosophical Study. Eastern Book Linkers.
James Mark Shields (2012). Imperial-Way Zen: Ichikawa Hakugen's Critique and Lingering Questions for Buddhist Ethics. Philosophy East and West 62 (1):128-130.
Derek K. Heyman (1997). Dual and Non-Dual Ontology in Satre and MahÄyÄNa Buddhism. Man and World 30 (4):431-443.
Mark T. Unno (1999). Review: Questions in the Making: A Review Essay on Zen Buddhist Ethics in the Context of Buddhist and Comparative Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (3):507 - 536.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #107,683 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?