Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||When I was first invited by Prof. Kim Yong-pyo, editor of the IJBTC, to review this book, I declined, due to the fact that Prof. Park was my teacher and mentor at SUNY Stony Brook, not only as a graduate student, but as an undergraduate as well. For this reason I was afraid that I would not be able to bring the requisite critical distance to the task. After having had the opportunity to read the book, however, I changed my mind, for two main reasons: (1) I realized that it might be personally satisfying to take the opportunity to re-engage myself in the kind of Buddhist soteriological discourse that originally attracted me to Buddhist Studies to begin with, and (2) the potential for lapses in proper critical distance notwithstanding, I felt that there is some sense in which I could bring some insights into the appraisal of this book probably only accessible to myself, given my long relationship with Sung Bae Park and my deep personal interest in his project. So I hope readers of this review will accept it with these factors in mind. There is one question that we may want to ask before dealing with a book like this: Is there a place in our Buddhist Studies academia for the discussion of personal religious experience, or for the investigation of the phenomenon of religiosity? I know of more than a few who would answer such a question with an outright "no." Others might say, "It depends upon how one goes about it." And still others may be very excited by such a prospect.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Jin Y. Park (2011). One Korean's Approach to Buddhism: The Mom/Momjit Paradigm (Review). Philosophy East and West 61 (3):576-578.
Charles Muller, The Key Operative Concepts in Korean Buddhist Syncretic Philosophy: Interpenetration 通達) and Essence-Function 體用) in Wŏnhyo, Chinul and Kihwa.
Jin Y. Park (2003). Living the Inconceivable: Hua-Yen Buddhism and Postmodern Différend. Asian Philosophy 13 (2 & 3):165 – 174.
Charles Muller, Innate Enlightenment and No-Thought: A Response to the Critical Buddhist Position on Zen.
J. L. Schellenberg (2005). The Hiddenness Argument Revisited (II). Religious Studies 41 (3):287 - 303.
A. Charles Muller, The Buddhist Confucian Conflict in the Early Chosôn and Kihwa's Syncretic Response: The Hyôn Chông Non.
Peter D. Hershock (2010). Review of Jin Y. Park, Buddhism and Postmodernity: Zen, Huayan, and the Possibility of Buddhist Postmodern Ethics. [REVIEW] Sophia 49 (1):153-155.
Emilio Corchado, Vaclav Snasel, Ajith Abraham, Michał Woźniak, Manuel Grana & Sung-Bae Cho (eds.) (2012). Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems. Springer.
Jay L. Garfield (2006). Why Did Bodhidharma Go to the East? Buddhism's Struggle with the Mind in the World. Sophia 45 (2):61-80.
Jin Park (2010). Buddhism and Postmodernity: Zen, Huayan, and the Possibility of Buddhist Postmodern Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield.
Jonathan A. Silk (2007). Good and Evil in Indian Buddhism: The Five Sins of Immediate Retribution. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (3):253-286.
Adrian Konik (2009). Buddhism and Transgression: The Appropriation of Buddhism in the Contemporary West. Brill.
Darlene Fozard Weaver (2001). Review: How Sin Works: A Review Essay. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (3):471 - 501.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads9 ( #122,589 of 740,795 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,957 of 740,795 )
How can I increase my downloads?