David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):639-660 (2011)
This paper examines the significance of Anscombe’s decision to substitute the example of Excalibur for that of Nothung in section 39 of the PhilosophicalInvestigations. It argues that the substitution significantly alters the mythological background to Wittgenstein’s discussion of naming and its philosophical subliming, in which the Theatetus conception of identity, composition, and decomposition (as exemplified by objects and their possessors) is contrasted with that of Wagner’s Ring; for Arthurian legend conceives of these matters differently again. The broader purpose of the paper is to demonstrate that these mythological worlds are not dispensable ornaments to Wittgenstein’s philosophical explorations, but rather internal to his way of guiding and reorienting our reflections on proper names, personal identity, and selfhood
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dr Lambros Malafouris (2008). Is It 'Me' or is It 'Mine'? The Mycenaean Sword as a Body-Part. In Cogprints.
A. Cunningham (2003). The Pen and the Sword: Recovering the Disciplinary Identity of Physiology and Anatomy Before 1800 - II: Old Anatomy-the Sword. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (1):51-76.
Stephen Mulhall (2007). Wittgenstein's Private Language: Grammar, Nonsense, and Imagination in Philosophical Investigations, Sections 243-315. Oxford University Press.
S. Franchi (2011). Radical Constructivism's Tathandlung, Structure, and Geist. Constructivist Foundations 7 (1):17-20.
Genia Schönbaumsfeld (2010). A “Resolute” Later Wittgenstein? Metaphilosophy 41 (5):649-668.
Thomas Rentsch (1996). Die Negativität der Sprache. Bemerkungen zu Adorno und Wittgenstein. Wittgenstein-Studien 3 (1).
Robert Stout (1923). The Need of Courage. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):77 – 83.
Stephen Mulhall (2001). Inheritance and Originality: Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard. Oxford University Press.
Charles N. Rotimi (2003). Genetic Ancestry Tracing and the African Identity: A Double-Edged Sword? Developing World Bioethics 3 (2):151–158.
Andrew A. Brennan (1988). Conditions of Identity: A Study of Identity and Survival. Oxford University Press.
Jason Bridges (2010). Wittgenstein Vs Contextualism. In Arif Ahmed (ed.), Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press
Eileen Serene (1980). Anselm's Modal Concepts. In S. Knuuttila (ed.), Reforging the Great Chain of Being: Studies of the History of Modal Theories. Reidel 117-162.
Theodore Sider (1999). Global Supervenience and Identity Across Times and Worlds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (4):913-937.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads14 ( #280,835 of 2,256,910 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,476 of 2,256,910 )
How can I increase my downloads?