Topoi 25 (1-2) (2006)
|Abstract||Philosophy in the West divides into three parts: Analytic Philosophy (AP), Continental Philosophy (CP), and History of Philosophy (HP). But all three parts are in a bad way. AP is sceptical about the claim that philosophy can be a science, and hence is uninterested in the real world. CP is never pursued in a properly theoretical way, and its practice is tailor-made for particular political and ethical conclusions. HP is mostly developed on a regionalist basis: what is studied is determined by the nation or culture to which a philosopher belongs, rather than by the objective value of that philosopher’s work. Progress in philosophy can only be attained by avoiding these pitfalls.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert E. Goodin & Philip Pettit (eds.) (2006). Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Blackwell Publishing.
Garrett Cullity (2008). Public Goods and Fairness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (1):1 – 21.
Thorsten Botz-Bornstein (2010). Is Critical Regionalist Philosophy Possible? Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (1):11-25.
Barry Smith & David Woodruff Smith (eds.) (1995). The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Krom (2007). The Relevance of Contemplation: Aristotle on the Philosopher and the Common Good. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):30-38.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads117 ( #4,425 of 549,014 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #4,128 of 549,014 )
How can I increase my downloads?