Inheritance in socio-political context: The case for reviving the sociological discourse of inheritance tax law
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The anti-'death tax' movement is the starting point for contemporary discussions of inheritance taxation. The political rhetoric surrounding calls for its repeal typically is met with analyses of the extent to which inheritance tax avoidance benefits the wealthy, and arguments that inheritance taxation is fair and 'targeted'. This article suggests that engagement by tax lawyers with sociological theories of economic inheritance has the potential to revive this discourse. A renewed approach to inheritance taxation is of immediate concern to supporters of inheritance taxation in the United Kingdom, who face considerable obstacles posed by the increasing use of United States anti-inheritance tax movement political rhetoric by politicians. Durkheim's consideration of the conjugal family and, more recently, Beckert's sociology of inheritance are submitted as analyses that, amongst others, have particular potential. Such engagement also has the potential to revive the interest of sociologists in inheritance taxation, memorably described by MacNamee and Miller as a sociological lacuna.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
George Windholz & P. A. Lamal (1991). Pavlov's View of the Inheritance of Acquired Characteristics as It Relates to Theses Concerning Scientific Change. Synthese 88 (1):97 - 111.
A. S. Owen (1922). A Great Inheritance New Studies of a Great Inheritance. By Professor R. S. Conway, Litt.D. One Volume. Pp. Viii + 241. 8″ × 5″. London: John Murray, 1921. 7s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 36 (1-2):39-41.
John Odling-Smee (2007). Niche Inheritance: A Possible Basis for Classifying Multiple Inheritance Systems in Evolution. Biological Theory 2 (3):276-289.
Paula A. Monopoli, Nonmarital Children and Post-Death Parentage: A Different Path for Inheritance Law?
Luc Steels (2007). Is Symbolic Inheritance Similar to Genetic Inheritance? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (4):376-377.
Carla E. Kary (1982). Can Darwinian Inheritance Be Extended From Biology to Epistemology? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:356 - 369.
Richmond H. Thomason & John F. Horty, A Clash of Intuitions: The Current State of Nonmonotonic Multiple Inheritance Systems.
J. F. Horty, R. H. Thomason & D. S. Touretzky (1990). A Sceptical Theory of Inheritance in Nonmonotonic Semantic Networks. Artificial Intelligence 42:311-348.
Ehud Lamm, Inheritance Systems. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #280,396 of 1,793,092 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,412 of 1,793,092 )
How can I increase my downloads?