David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (3):369-375 (2012)
In Watching Sport, Stephen Mumford distinguishes two ways in which sport can be seen. A purist sees it aesthetically while a partisan sees it competitively. But this overlooks the obvious point that most sports fans are neither entirely purist nor entirely partisan. The norm will be some moderate position in between with the purist and partisan as ideal limits. What is then the point of considering these pure aesthetic and pure competitive ways of seeing? In this discussion note, I consider possible accounts of the way in which the moderate spectator watches. After rejecting what I call a pure perception theory and a mixed view, I defend an oscillation theory. This means that the moderate sports fan is one who switches, sometimes rapidly, between the aesthetic and competitive perceptions of sport. A pay-off of this account is that we do not need a further, third way of perceiving sport in order to account for the moderate. It has been explained in terms of our original two forms of perception. This fills a lacuna in Mumford's account
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
J. L. Austin (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford University Press.
Nicholas Dixon (2001). The Ethics of Supporting Sports Teams. Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):149–158.
Citations of this work BETA
Graham McFee (2013). Making Sense of the Philosophy of Sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 7 (4):412-429.
Graham McFee (forthcoming). A Not-So-Beautiful Game. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy:1-16.
Leon Culbertson (forthcoming). Perception, Aspects and Explanation: Some Remarks on Moderate Partisanship. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy:1-23.
Stephen Mumford (2013). Ways of Watching Sport. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 73:3-15.
Similar books and articles
J. S. Russell (2012). The Ideal Fan or Good Fans? Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (1):16-30.
Stephen Mumford (2011). Watching Sport: Aesthetics, Ethics and Emotion for the Spectator. Routledge.
João Tiago Lima (2012). The Competitive Perception. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 6 (1):61-66.
Robert Audi (1998). Moderate Intuitionism and the Epistemology of Moral Judgment. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (1):15-44.
Nick Zangwill (2000). In Defence of Moderate Aesthetic Formalism. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201):476-493.
Kevin Krein (2008). Sport, Nature and Worldmaking. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2 (3):285 – 301.
Noel Carroll (1998). Moderate Moralism Versus Moderate Autonomism. British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (4):419-424.
Ingvar Johansson (2008). Christer Svennerlind, Moderate Nominalism and Moderate Realism and Pierre Grenon, On Relations. Metaphysica 9 (2):241-246.
A. Inoue (2013). Is Moderate Essentialism Truly Moderate? Public Health Ethics 6 (1):21-27.
Emily Crookston (2005). Strict Just War Theory and Conditional Pacifism. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 79:73-84.
John Alan Cohan (2003). Is Hunting a “Sport”? International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):291-326.
Sigmund Loland (2007). Justice in Sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):78 – 95.
Piotr Szalek (2010). Does Virtue Ethics Really Exclude Duty Ethics? International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3):351-361.
Robert Stecker (2006). Carroll's Bones. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (3):282-286.
Added to index2012-08-09
Total downloads11 ( #212,738 of 1,724,748 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #210,951 of 1,724,748 )
How can I increase my downloads?