David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Youth Studies (forthcoming)
In this article, I claim that at least some young people have the requisite capacity for political participation, and that the exclusion of these young people is in breach of the reasonable expectation that all capable citizens are included in democratic processes. I suggest implementing a capacity test for those under the current age of majority. I outline a system of capacity testing for the youth, distinguish this proposal from prior attempts to justify capacity testing and argue that a suitably constrained capacity testing regime is not simply defensible, but superior to the current system, which arbitrarily excludes some capable members of society from participation. Finally, I explain why only this limited capacity testing regime is acceptable.
|Keywords||Youth Enfranchisement Capacity Testing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas John Munn (2012). Reconciling the Criminal and Participatory Responsibilities of the Youth. Social Theory and Practice 38 (1):139-159.
Nicole A. Vincent (2009). Responsibility: Distinguishing Virtue From Capacity. Polish Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):111-26.
Tim Thornton (2011). Capacity, Mental Mechanisms, and Unwise Decisions. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):127-132.
Nelson Cowan (1998). What is More Explanatory, Processing Capacity or Processing Speed? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):835-836.
Dimitrios Adamis, Adrian Treloar, Finbarr C. Martin & Alastair J. D. Macdonald (2010). Ethical Research in Delirium: Arguments for Including Decisionally Incapacitated Subjects. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):169-174.
Adrian Treloar Dimitrios Adamis, C. Martin Finbarr & J. D. Macdonald Alastair (2010). Ethical Research in Delirium: Arguments for Including Decisionally Incapacitated Subjects. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1).
Nicholas J. Caste (1992). Drug Testing and Productivity. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (4):301 - 306.
George Munchus (1989). Testing as a Selection Tool: Another Old and Sticky Managerial Human Rights Issue. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (10):817 - 820.
Daniel B. Berch & Elizabeth J. Foley (1998). Processing Demands Associated with Relational Complexity: Testing Predictions with Dual-Task Methodologies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):832-833.
Niels A. Taatgen (2001). Dispelling the Magic: Towards Memory Without Capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):147-148.
Peter Lucas (2011). Decision-Making Capacity and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):117-122.
Shaun Nichols (2001). Mindreading and the Cognitive Architecture Underlying Altruistic Motivation. Mind and Language 16 (4):425-455.
Michele S. Moses & Michael J. Nanna (2007). The Testing Culture and the Persistence of High Stakes Testing Reforms. Education and Culture 23 (1):55-72.
Lisa Bortolotti (2012). The Relative Importance of Undesirable Truths. Medicine Healthcare and Philosophy (4):683-690.
Guy Claxton (2007). Expanding Young People's Capacity to Learn. British Journal of Educational Studies 55 (2):115 - 134.
Added to index2012-07-22
Total downloads9 ( #375,442 of 1,911,838 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,984 of 1,911,838 )
How can I increase my downloads?