How do research duties conflict with Aboriginal Rights? Genetics Research and Biobank Problem in Taiwan
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dilemata 2 (4):33-56 (2010)
Taiwan has a population of 23 million, of which some 500,000 are Aborigines. Recent conflicts over a national biobank as part of Taiwan's biotechnological industrial development, genetic research on Aboriginal origins, and commercialization of research findings involving Aborigines have raised a number of important ethical conflicts. These ethical conflicts involve on one hand, the importance of researchers' duties, and on the other hand, Aboriginal rights. This paper will go in three steps. First, this paper describes the three cases of ethical violations of Aboriginal rights committed by Taiwanese researchers in the course of their scientific duties. After having given an account of ethical conflicts between research duties and Aboriginal rights, the paper addresses larger ethical issues underlying this Taiwanese research context. Finally, the paper considers if stronger ethical regulation could reconcile Aboriginal rights and research duties.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lars Øystein Ursin (2008). Biobank Research and the Right to Privacy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Charles Weijer & James A. Anderson, A Critical Appraisal of Protections for Aboriginal Communities in Biomedical Research.
Søren Holm (2011). Withdrawing From Research: A Rethink in the Context of Research Biobanks. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 19 (3):269-281.
Danny Frederick (2010). Why Universal Welfare Rights Are Impossible and What It Means. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (4):428-445.
Charles Weijer, Gary Goldsand & Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Protecting Communities in Research: Current Guidelines and Limits of Extrapolation.
Lars Oystein Ursin (2010). Privacy and Property in the Biobank Context. HEC Forum 22 (3):211-224.
David Miller (2005). Reasonable Partiality Towards Compatriots. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (1-2):63 - 81.
Donald Nikkel, Rethinking Restrictions: A Liberal Approach to Minority Rights and Aboriginal Education.
Jon C. Altman & Melinda Hickson (eds.) (2010). Culture Crisis: Anthropology and Politics in Aboriginal Australia. University of New South Wales Press.
Kevin McGovern (2008). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research. Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 13 (4):9.
Ivar Kolstad (2012). Human Rights and Positive Corporate Duties: The Importance of Corporate–State Interaction. Business Ethics 21 (3):276-285.
Megan Jane Davis, Indigenous Women's Representation and the Proposal for a New National Representative Body.
Lisa Bortolotti & Bert Heinrichs (2007). Delimiting the Concept of Research: An Ethical Perspective. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):157-179.
Paul Patton (2005). Foucault, Critique and Rights. Critical Horizons 6 (1):267-287.
Added to index2011-07-12
Total downloads7 ( #149,727 of 1,088,398 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,398 )
How can I increase my downloads?