Resemblances of identity: Ludwig Wittgenstein and contemporary feminist legal theory
Res Publica 12 (2) (2006)
| Abstract | In a context in which there is manifest multiplicity in women’s daily lives, feminists have struggled to identify what it uniquely means to be a woman, without falling prey to charges of essentialism. Conscious, however, of the role which collective gender identity plays in providing coherence and motivation to feminist activity, a number of theorists have sought to find a way to retain group cohesion in the face of internal diversity. In this article, the merits and demerits of pre-existing attempts in this regard will be discussed. Having done so, an alternative approach, which builds on Wittgenstein’s concept of ‘family resemblances’, will be put forward and defended. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
María Martínez González (2008). Feminist Praxis Challenges the Identity Question: Toward New Collective Identity Metaphors. Hypatia 23 (3):pp. 22-38.
Leslie J. Miller & Jana Metcalfe (1998). Strategically Speaking: The Problem of Essentializing Terms in Feminist Theory and Feminist Organizational Talk. Human Studies 21 (3):235-257.
Karen H. Rothenberg (1996). Feminism, Law, and Bioethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (1):69-84.
Lois McNay (2000). Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory. Blackwell Publishers.
Ben Tilghman (2008). Kaufman on Art, Family Resemblances, and Wittgenstein. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (1):86-88.
Heather J. Gert (1995). Family Resemblances and Criteria. Synthese 105 (2):177-190.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,748 of 549,119 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,119 )How can I increase my downloads? |

