The best is yet to come: The promise of models of developmental disorders
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):765-766 (2002)
| Abstract | The developmental modeling approach to investigating developmental disorders appears highly promising. In this commentary, we question the untapped potential of this approach for supporting insights into particular developmental disorders, developmental processes across the life span, and the viability of traditional theories of developmental disorders. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJ. Briscoe (2002). The Beauty of Models for Developmental Disorders. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):750-752.
Franck Ramus (2002). Evidence for a Domain-Specific Deficit in Developmental Dyslexia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):767-768.
Ruth Condray & Stuart R. Steinhauer (2002). The Residual Normality Assumption and Models of Cognition in Schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):753-754.
Paula Tallal (2002). Are Developmental Disabilities the Same in Children and Adults? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):768-769.
Naama Friedmann & Aviah Gvion (2002). Modularity in Developmental Disorders: Evidence From Specific Language Impairment and Peripheral Dyslexias. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):756-757.
Gary F. Marcus (2002). What Can Developmental Disorders Tell Us About Modularity? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):762-763.
Michael Thomas & Annette Karmiloff-Smith (2002). Are Developmental Disorders Like Cases of Adult Brain Damage? Implications From Connectionist Modelling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):727-750.
Ralph-Axel Müller (2002). Weak Evidence for a Strong Case Against Modularity in Developmental Disorders. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):764-765.
Christine Temple & Harald Clahsen (2002). How Connectionist Simulations Fail to Account for Developmental Disorders in Children. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):769-770.
Morten H. Christiansen, Christopher M. Conway & Michelle R. Ellefson (2002). Raising the Bar for Connectionist Modeling of Cognitive Developmental Disorders. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):752-753.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #275,053 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
