“Unfit for Life”: A Case Study of Protector-Protected Analogies in Recent Advocacy of Eugenics and Coercive Genetic Discrimination [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):177-189 (2011)
|Abstract||This paper utilizes Iris Marion Young’s critical, post-9/11 reading of Thomas Hobbes, as a theorist of authoritarian government grounded in fear of threat (Young 2003). Applying Young’s reading of Hobbes to the high-profile ethicist Julian Savulescu’s advocacy of genetic enhancement reveals an underlying unjust discrimination in Savulescu’s use of patriarchal protector–protected analogies between family and state. First, the paper shows how Savulescu’s concept of procreative beneficence, in which parents use genetic selection to have children who will have the best lives possible, is unjustly discriminatory against marginalized groups. Increasingly, however, he has invoked public security to justify genetic interventions. In recent speeches, Savulescu has argued a global state of emergency is developing due to a combination of the global environmental crisis, the threat of bioterrorism, and the failure of liberalism. To help deal with this emerging state of emergency, Savulescu advocates an unjustly discriminatory array of genetic-based governance practices, including detention and segregation|
|Keywords||Eugenics Prejudice Coercion National security|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lisa N. Geller, Joseph S. Alper, Paul R. Billings, Carol I. Barash, Jonathan Beckwith & Marvin R. Natowicz (1996). Individual, Family, and Societal Dimensions of Genetic Discrimination: A Case Study Analysis. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):71-88.
Margaret Otlowski (2005). Exploring the Concept of Genetic Discrimination. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (3):165-176.
Sarah E. Stoller (2008). Why We Are Not Morally Required to Select the Best Children: A Response to Savulescu. Bioethics 22 (7):364-369.
B. M. Kious (2010). Genetic Nondiscrimination and Health Care as an Entitlement. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):86-100.
Matthew DeCamp & Allen Buchanan (2007). Pt. VI. Genetics and Enhancement. Population Genetic Research and Screening: Conceptual and Ethical Issues / Eric Juengst ; Enhancement / Thomas Murray ; Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings / Julian Savulescu ; Pharmacogenomics: Ethical and Regulatory Issues. [REVIEW] In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Neil A. Manson (2007). Why Shouldn't Insurance Companies Know Your Genetic Information? Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):345-356.
Julian Savulescu (2007). Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings. In . Oxford University Press.
J. Adam Carter & Emma C. Gordon (2013). Intelligence, Wellbeing and Procreative Beneficence. Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (2):122-135.
William D. Murry, James C. Wimbush & Dan R. Dalton (2001). Genetic Screening in the Workplace: Legislative and Ethical Implications. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 29 (4):365 - 378.
Robert Sparrow (2011). Liberalism and Eugenics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):499 - 517.
Ruth Chadwick, Henk ten Have, Jfrgen Husted, Mairi Levitt, Tony McGleenan, Darren Shickle & Urban Wiesing (1998). Genetic Screening and Ethics: European Perspectives. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (3):255 – 273.
Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu (2012). Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement. Oxford University Press.
Robert J. Boyle & Julian Savulescu (2003). Prenatal Diagnosis for "Minor" Genetic Abnormalities is Ethical. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):60-65.
Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta (2007). Private and Public Eugenics: Genetic Testing and Screening in India. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):217-228.
Added to index2011-03-13
Total downloads17 ( #78,361 of 757,852 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,427 of 757,852 )
How can I increase my downloads?