David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Res Publica 17 (2):125-140 (2011)
Within philosophy there has been little discussion of the risks associated with natural events such as earthquakes. The first objective of this paper is to demonstrate why such risks should be the subject of more sustained philosophical interest. We argue that we cannot simply apply to risks associated with natural events those insights and frameworks for moral evaluation developed in the literature considering ordinary risks, technological risks and the risks posed by anthropogenic climate change. The second objective of this paper is to identify and develop a framework for the moral evaluation of the source of the risks associated with natural events, or the actions which sustain and impact such risks. Our discussion concentrates on the ways the construction and modification of built and natural environments can alter the probability of occurrence of natural events and the character and magnitude of the impact that such events have. We then argue for the need to develop a standard of reasonable care for decisions about the built and modified natural environment, which accounts for technical and resource constraints, as well as the place of natural hazard mitigation in public policy
|Keywords||Risk Natural disasters Engineering Standard of care|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jane Bennett (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press.
Stephen M. Gardiner (2004). Ethics and Global Climate Change. Ethics 114 (3):555-600.
Sven Ove Hansson (2004). Philosophical Perspectives on Risk. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 8 (1):10-35.
Simon Caney (2009). Climate Change and the Future: Discounting for Time, Wealth, and Risk. Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (2):163-186.
Susan Haack (2009). Irreconcilable Differences? The Troubled Marriage of Science and Law. Law and Contemporary Problems 72 (1).
Citations of this work BETA
Colleen Murphy, Paolo Gardoni & Charles Harris (2011). Classification and Moral Evaluation of Uncertainties in Engineering Modeling. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):553-570.
Similar books and articles
Colleen Murphy & Paolo Gardoni (2008). The Acceptability and the Tolerability of Societal Risks: A Capabilities-Based Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1):77-92.
Colleen Murphy Æ Paolo Gardoni, The Acceptability and the Tolerability of Societal Risks: A Capabilities-Based Approach.
Per Sandin (2005). Naturalness and de Minimis Risk. Environmental Ethics 27 (2):191-200.
Douglas MacLean (1982). Quantification, Regulation, and Risk Assessment. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:243 - 260.
Thomas Heyd (2008). Culture and Climate Change. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:45-52.
E. Schuller (2004). Perception of Risk and Nanotechnology. In Baird D. (ed.), Discovering the Nanoscale. Ios
Sean A. Weaver & Michael C. Morris (2005). Risks Associated with Genetic Modification: – An Annotated Bibliography of Peer Reviewed Natural Science Publications. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (2):157-189.
Janice R. Dillon (1981). Informed Consent and the Disclosure of Risks of Treatment: The Supreme Court of Canada Decides. [REVIEW] Bioethics Quarterly 3 (3-4):156-162.
Martin Peterson (2001). New Technologies And The Ethics Of Extreme Risks. Ends and Means 5 (2).
John T. Sanders (1996). Risk and Value. A.S.V.I. News 1996 (Spring):4-5.
Pursey Heugens & Nikolay Dentchev (2007). Taming Trojan Horses: Identifying and Mitigating Corporate Social Responsibility Risks. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 75 (2):151 - 170.
James Franklin & Scott Sisson, Assessment of Strategies for Evaluating Extreme Risks. Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis Reports.
Heidi Storl (1993). The Risks of Going Natural. Southwest Philosophy Review 9 (1):23-33.
Added to index2010-12-10
Total downloads34 ( #118,454 of 1,907,077 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #91,743 of 1,907,077 )
How can I increase my downloads?