Graduate studies at Western
Res Publica 17 (2):125-140 (2011)
|Abstract||Within philosophy there has been little discussion of the risks associated with natural events such as earthquakes. The first objective of this paper is to demonstrate why such risks should be the subject of more sustained philosophical interest. We argue that we cannot simply apply to risks associated with natural events those insights and frameworks for moral evaluation developed in the literature considering ordinary risks, technological risks and the risks posed by anthropogenic climate change. The second objective of this paper is to identify and develop a framework for the moral evaluation of the source of the risks associated with natural events, or the actions which sustain and impact such risks. Our discussion concentrates on the ways the construction and modification of built and natural environments can alter the probability of occurrence of natural events and the character and magnitude of the impact that such events have. We then argue for the need to develop a standard of reasonable care for decisions about the built and modified natural environment, which accounts for technical and resource constraints, as well as the place of natural hazard mitigation in public policy|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Colleen Murphy & Paolo Gardoni (2008). The Acceptability and the Tolerability of Societal Risks: A Capabilities-Based Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1):77-92.
Colleen Murphy Æ Paolo Gardoni, The Acceptability and the Tolerability of Societal Risks: A Capabilities-Based Approach.
Per Sandin (2005). Naturalness and de Minimis Risk. Environmental Ethics 27 (2):191-200.
Douglas MacLean (1982). Quantification, Regulation, and Risk Assessment. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:243 - 260.
Thomas Heyd (2008). Culture and Climate Change. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:45-52.
Sean A. Weaver & Michael C. Morris (2005). Risks Associated with Genetic Modification: – An Annotated Bibliography of Peer Reviewed Natural Science Publications. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (2):157-189.
Janice R. Dillon (1981). Informed Consent and the Disclosure of Risks of Treatment: The Supreme Court of Canada Decides. [REVIEW] Bioethics Quarterly 3 (3-4):156-162.
John T. Sanders (1996). Risk and Value. A.S.V.I. News 1996 (Spring):4-5.
Pursey Heugens & Nikolay Dentchev (2007). Taming Trojan Horses: Identifying and Mitigating Corporate Social Responsibility Risks. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 75 (2):151 - 170.
James Franklin & Scott Sisson, Assessment of Strategies for Evaluating Extreme Risks. Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis Reports.
Heidi Storl (1993). The Risks of Going Natural. Southwest Philosophy Review 9 (1):23-33.
Added to index2010-12-10
Total downloads16 ( #81,883 of 738,851 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,851 )
How can I increase my downloads?