Evaluating the Source of the Risks Associated with Natural Events

Res Publica 17 (2):125-140 (2011)
Abstract
Within philosophy there has been little discussion of the risks associated with natural events such as earthquakes. The first objective of this paper is to demonstrate why such risks should be the subject of more sustained philosophical interest. We argue that we cannot simply apply to risks associated with natural events those insights and frameworks for moral evaluation developed in the literature considering ordinary risks, technological risks and the risks posed by anthropogenic climate change. The second objective of this paper is to identify and develop a framework for the moral evaluation of the source of the risks associated with natural events, or the actions which sustain and impact such risks. Our discussion concentrates on the ways the construction and modification of built and natural environments can alter the probability of occurrence of natural events and the character and magnitude of the impact that such events have. We then argue for the need to develop a standard of reasonable care for decisions about the built and modified natural environment, which accounts for technical and resource constraints, as well as the place of natural hazard mitigation in public policy
Keywords Risk  Natural disasters  Engineering  Standard of care
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,365
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Jules L. Coleman, Theories of Tort Law. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 27 references

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Per Sandin (2005). Naturalness and de Minimis Risk. Environmental Ethics 27 (2):191-200.
Douglas MacLean (1982). Quantification, Regulation, and Risk Assessment. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:243 - 260.
Thomas Heyd (2008). Culture and Climate Change. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:45-52.
John T. Sanders (1996). Risk and Value. A.S.V.I. News 1996 (Spring):4-5.
James Franklin & Scott Sisson, Assessment of Strategies for Evaluating Extreme Risks. Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis Reports.
Heidi Storl (1993). The Risks of Going Natural. Southwest Philosophy Review 9 (1):23-33.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-12-10

Total downloads

21 ( #82,692 of 1,102,739 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #61,837 of 1,102,739 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.