David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
OUP Oxford (2011)
Does God's existence make a difference to how we explain morality? Mark C. Murphy critiques the two dominant theistic accounts of morality--natural law theory and divine command theory--and presents a novel third view. He argues that we can value natural facts about humans and their good, while keeping God at the centre of our moral explanations. The characteristic methodology of theistic ethics is to proceed by asking whether there are features of moral norms that can be adequately explained only if we hold that such norms have some sort of theistic foundation. But this methodology, fruitful as it has been, is one-sided. God and Moral Law proceeds not from the side of the moral norms, so to speak, but from the God side of things: what sort of explanatory relationship should we expect between God and moral norms given the existence of the God of orthodox theism? Mark C. Murphy asks whether the conception of God in orthodox theism as an absolutely perfect being militates in favour of a particular view of the explanation of morality by appeal to theistic facts. He puts this methodology to work and shows that, surprisingly, natural law theory and divine command theory fail to offer the sort of explanation of morality that we would expect given the existence of the God of orthodox theism. Drawing on the discussion of a structurally similar problem--that of the relationship between God and the laws of nature--Murphy articulates his new account of the relationship between God and morality, one in which facts about God and facts about nature cooperate in the explanation of moral law.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$53.58 new (24% off) $58.79 used (17% off) $63.00 direct from Amazon (10% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mark C. Murphy (2012). Restricted Theological Voluntarism. Philosophy Compass 7 (10):679-690.
Similar books and articles
Stephen J. Sullivan (1993). Robert Adams's Theistic Argument From the Nature of Morality. Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (2):303 - 312.
Christian Miller (2013). God and Moral Law: On the Theistic Explanation of Morality. By Mark C. Murphy. (Oxford UP, 2011. Pp. X + 192. Price £35.00.). [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):398-400.
Simin Rahimi (2012). Divine Command Theory and Theistic Activism. Heythrop Journal 53 (4):551-559.
Jacek Wojtysiak (2010). Morality, God, and Possible Worlds: A Paper Inspired By Richard Swinburne's 'God and Morality'. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):199 - 208.
Evan Fales (2010). Divine Commands and Moral Obligation. Philo 13 (2):151 - 166.
Ton van den Beld (2001). The Morality System with and Without God. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (4):383-399.
Timothy Chappell (2011). Theism in Historical Perspective. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):123 - 138.
Susan Peppers-Bates (2008). Divine Simplicity and Divine Command Ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):361-369.
Katherin Rogers (2005). God and Moral Realism. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (1):103-118.
David Baggett (2011). Good God: The Theistic Foundations of Morality. Oxford University Press.
Jason S. Wright (1981). Morality and Hebraic Christian Religion. Journal of Moral Education 11 (1):32-40.
Luke Gelinas (2009). The Problem of Natural Evil I: General Theistic Replies. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):533-559.
George I. Mavrodes (1970). The Rationality of Belief in God. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
Stephen R. Palmquist (2009). Kant's Religious Argument for the Existence of God. Faith and Philosophy 26 (1):3-22.
Added to index2012-04-15
Total downloads21 ( #68,698 of 1,088,403 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,403 )
How can I increase my downloads?