Health Care Analysis 8 (2):155-169 (2000)
|Abstract||This article surveys a range of recent media storiesabout human gametes, pinning them to a series of widerpreoccupations within late modern life. Threepreoccupations are singled out: first, kinship andrelational identity; secondly, Nature andglobalisation; and finally, sexual difference andequality. Each one of these preoccupations has beencharacterised as iconic; debates about them are saidto crystallise who we are, especially ouruncertainties, and what we will be in the future. Byindexing these preoccupations to the stories abouthuman gametes, the article aims to upset both theincreasing attempts to present assisted reproductiontechnologies as `familiar' (as Nature's `helpinghand', for example) and the recurringassumptions about this technology's alleged`novelty' and `anomaly'. The article concludesthat treating reproduction technologies, and theirregulation, as `familiar' risks complacency:equally, assumptions about their `novelty' narrowsthe search for effective explanatory tools andregulatory mechanisms. The upshot is that it might bebest for us to view reproductive technologies as bothless `familiar' and less `novel'|
|Keywords||gametes globalisation identity kinship law nature sexual difference|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alfonso Gómez-Lobo (2004). Does Respect for Embryos Entail Respect for Gametes? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):199-208.
L. Bernier (2004). Reproductive and Therapeutic Cloning, Germline Therapy, and Purchase of Gametes and Embryos: Comments on Canadian Legislation Governing Reproduction Technologies. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):527-532.
Augustine Casiday (2012). On Heresy in Modern Patristic Scholarship: The Case of Evagrius Ponticus. Heythrop Journal 53 (2):241-252.
Michael R. Soules (1999). Commentary: Posthumous Harvesting of Gametes ? A Physician's Perspective. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (4):362-365.
Sonia Bychkov Green, Interstate Intercourse: How Modern Assisted Reproductive Technologies Challenge the Traditional Realm of Conflicts of Law.
Andrew Scott (2013). Legal Responses to Some of the New Developments in Reproductive Technologies Part.3 The Future of Reproductive Technologies and the Law. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 8 (2):24 - 28.
Thérèse Murphy (ed.) (2009). New Technologies and Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Sarah Chan & Muireann Quigley (2007). Frozen Embryos, Genetic Information and Reproductive Rights. Bioethics 21 (8):439–448.
Marie Thérèse Meulders-Klein, Ruth Deech & P. Vlaardingerbroek (eds.) (2002). Biomedicine, the Family, and Human Rights. Kluwer Law International.
Thérèse Murphy (2009). The Texture of Reproductive Choice : Law, Ethnography, and Reproductive Technologies. In Thérèse Murphy (ed.), New Technologies and Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Suzanne Holland (2001). Contested Commodities at Both Ends of Life: Buying and Selling Gametes, Embryos, and Body Tissues. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (3):263-284.
James Wetzel (2004). Splendid Vices and Secular Virtues: Variations on Milbank's Augustine. Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):271 - 300.
Godfrey B. Tangwa (2008). Third Party Assisted Conception: An African Perspective. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (5):297-306.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads2 ( #246,081 of 722,864 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?