David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bioethics 27 (4):224-232 (2013)
Sex selection of children by pre-conception and post-conception techniques remains morally controversial and even illegal in some jurisdictions. Among other things, some critics fear that sex selection will distort the sex ratio, making opposite-sex relationships more difficult to secure, while other critics worry that sex selection will tilt some nations toward military aggression. The human sex ratio varies depending on how one estimates it; there is certainly no one-to-one correspondence between males and females either at birth or across the human lifespan. Complications about who qualifies as ‘male’ and ‘female’ complicate judgments about the ratio even further. Even a judiciously estimated sex ratio does not have, however, the kind of normative status that requires society to refrain from antenatal sex selection. Some societies exhibit lopsided sex ratios as a consequence of social policies and practices, and pragmatic estimates of social needs are a better guide to what the sex ratio should be, as against looking to ‘nature’. The natural sex ratio cannot be a sound moral basis for prohibiting parents from selecting the sex of their children, since it ultimately lacks any normative meaning for social choices
|Keywords||sex ratio ethics Natural Law assisted reproductive treatments|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Lazarus (2005). Sociosexuality and Sex Ratio: Sex Differences and Local Markets. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):288-288.
Bernhard Fink, John T. Manning & Nick Neave (2005). The Second to Fourth Digit Ratio, Sociosexuality, and Offspring Sex Ratio. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):283-284.
Myra J. Hird (2004). Sex, Gender, and Science. Palgrave Macmillan.
Juliet Tizzard (2004). Sex Selection, Child Welfare and Risk: A Critique of the HFEA's Recommendations on Sex Selection. Health Care Analysis 12 (1):61-68.
Bang Nguyen Pham, Wayne Hall, Peter S. Hill & Chalapati Rao, Analysis of Socio-Political and Health Practices Influencing Sex Ratio at Birth in Viet Nam.
Wayne Hall Bang Nguyen Pham, S. Hill Peter & Chalapati Rao, Analysis of Socio-Political and Health Practices Influencing Sex Ratio at Birth in Viet Nam.
David C. Geary (1998). Sexual Selection, the Division of Labor, and the Evolution of Sex Differences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):444-447.
Anna Mudde (2010). "Before You Formed in the Womb I Knew You": Sex Selection and Spaces of Ambiguity. Hypatia 25 (3):553 - 576.
Timothy F. Murphy (2010). The Ethics of Helping Transgender Men and Women Have Children. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (1):46-60.
Stella Sandford (2010). Plato and Sex. Polity Press.
Peter Frost (1998). Sex Differences May Indeed Exist for 3-D Navigational Abilities: But Was Sexual Selection Responsible? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):443-444.
Hans Joachim Poethke (1988). Sex Ratio Polymorphism: The Impact of Mutation and Drift on Evolution. Acta Biotheoretica 37 (2):121-147.
Todd K. Shackelford, Gregory J. LeBlanc, Richard L. Michalski & Viviana A. Weekes (2000). Analyses of Mating Differences Within-Sex and Between-Sex Are Complementary, Not Competing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):621-621.
Timothy F. Murphy (2011). Same-Sex Marriage: Not a Threat to Marriage or Children. Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (3):288-304.
Added to index2011-12-14
Total downloads21 ( #169,548 of 1,789,821 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #420,681 of 1,789,821 )
How can I increase my downloads?