David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hypatia 4 (3):66 - 84 (1989)
To what extent are women obliged to be child-bearers? If reproductive technology could offer some form of ectogenesis, would feminists regard it as a liberating reproductive option? Three lines of reproductive rights arguments currently used by feminists are applied to ectogenesis. Each fails to provide strong grounds for prohibiting it. Yet, there are several ways in which ectogenesis could contribute to women's oppression, in particular, if it were used to undermine abortion rights, reinforce traditional views of fertility, increase fetal rights in pregnancy, and perpetuate the unequal distribution of scarce medical resources. A re-thinking of women's relationship to pregnancy is needed in order to challenge ectogenetic research.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
M. P. Wells (1987). Ectogenesis, Justice and Utility: A Reply to James. Bioethics 1 (4):372–379.
Julien S. Murphy (1986). Abortion Wights and Fetal Termination. Journal of Social Philosophy 17 (1):11-16.
Deane Wells (1987). Ectogenesis, Justice and Utility: A Reply to James. Bioethics 1 (4):372-379.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rosemarie Tong (2004). Out-of-Body Gestation. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 11 (1):67-76.
Rebecca Bennett (2008). Is Reproduction Women's Business? How Should We Regulate Regarding Stored Embryos, Posthumous Pregnancy, Ectogenesis and Male Pregnancy? Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 2 (3).
Sandra Reineke (2008). In Vitro Veritas: New Reproductive and Genetic Technologies and Women's Rights in Contemporary France. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (1):91 - 125.
Robert Sparrow (2008). Is It “Every Man's Right to Have Babies If He Wants Them”?: Male Pregnancy and the Limits of Reproductive Liberty. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (3):pp. 275-299.
Kathryn L. Ponder & Melissa Nothnagle (2010). Damage Control: Unintended Pregnancy in the United States Military. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (2):386-395.
Enrico Maestri (2011). Fabbriche Della Vita. La Critica Ecofemminista Alle Tecniche Riproduttive Artificiali. Ragion Pratica 37 (2):417-442.
Leslie Cannold (1995). Women, Ectogenesis and Ethical Theory. Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):55-64.
Kelly Oliver (2010). Motherhood, Sexuality, and Pregnant Embodiment: Twenty-Five Years of Gestation. Hypatia 25 (4):760-777.
Kate Parsons (2010). Feminist Reflections on Miscarriage, in Light of Abortion. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (1):1-22.
Ruby Catsanos, Wendy Rogers & Mianna Lotz (2013). The Ethics of Uterus Transplantation. Bioethics 27 (2):65-73.
Amel Alghrani (2008). Regulating the Reproductive Revolution : Ectogenesis- a Regulatory Minefield? In Michael D. A. Freeman (ed.), Law and Bioethics / Edited by Michael Freeman. Oxford University Press
Michele Goodwin, Assisted Reproductive Technology & the Double-Bind: The Illusory Choice of Motherhood.
Samantha Brennan (1999). Reconciling Feminist Politics and Feminist Ethics on the Issue of Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy 30 (2):260–275.
Russell Armstrong (2008). Mandatory Hiv Testing in Pregnancy: Is There Ever a Time? Developing World Bioethics 8 (1):1–10.
Marjorie Weinzweig (1987). Pregnancy Leave, Comparable Worth, and Concepts of Equality. Hypatia 2 (1):71 - 101.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads20 ( #142,353 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?