David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 18 (1):70-92 (2001)
There is a story about the connection between the rise of consent theories of political obligation and the fall of natural law theories of political obligation that is popular among political philosophers but nevertheless false. The story is, to put it crudely, that the rise of consent theory in the modern period coincided with, and came as a result of, the fall of the natural law theory that dominated during the medieval period. Neat though it is, the story errs doubly, for it supposes both that consent did not play a key role in natural law theories of political authority offered in the medieval period (a supposition falsified by close inspection of the view of Aquinas, perhaps the paradigmatic natural law theorist) and that natural law theory did not play a key role in the consent theories of political authority offered in the modern period (a supposition falsified by close inspection of the views of Hobbes and Locke, perhaps the paradigmatic consent theorists).Footnotes* I owe thanks to Pat Káin, Paul Weithman, Bob Roberts, and Henry Richardson for instructive criticisms. John Hare was particularly helpful both in criticism and in conversation. I was supported by a fellowship from the Erasmus Institute while this essay was drafted
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
William A. Edmundson (2004). State of the Art: The Duty to Obey the Law. Legal Theory 10 (4):215–259.
Kenneth M. Ehrenberg (2011). Joseph Raz's Theory of Authority. Philosophy Compass 6 (12):884-894.
Similar books and articles
Daniel Schwartz (2008). Francisco Suárez on Consent and Political Obligation. Vivarium 46 (1):59-81.
Michael Davis (2012). Locke on Consent: The Two Treatises as Practical Ethics. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (248):464-485.
Dorota Mokrosińska (2013). What is Political About Political Obligation? A Neglected Lesson From Consent Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):88-108.
William A. Edmundson (2011). Consent and Its Cousins. Ethics 121 (2):335-53.
Mark C. Murphy (2006). Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas M. Hughes (2012). Is Political Obligation Necessary for Obedience? Hobbes on Hostility, War and Obligation. Teoria Politica 2:77-99.
P. J. Markie (2009). Political Obligation and the Particularity Problem. Ratio 22 (3):322-337.
Ellen Frankel, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2000). Natural Law and Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
George Klosko (2004). Multiple Principles of Political Obligation. Political Theory 32 (6):801-824.
Abner Greene (2012). Against Obligation: The Multiple Sources of Authority in a Liberal Democracy. Harvard University Press.
Jason Wyckoff (2010). The Inseparability Thesis. Southwest Philosophy Review 26 (1):51-59.
Y. V. Satyanarayana (2008). Morality and Political Obligation. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 3:103-110.
Peg Birmingham (2010). On Violence, Politics, and the Law. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (1):1-20.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads37 ( #104,985 of 1,789,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #167,370 of 1,789,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?