David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):253-273 (2009)
The penal substitution account of the Atonement fails for conceptual reasons: punishment is expressive action, condemning the party punished, and so is not transferable from a guilty to an innocent party. But there is a relative to the penal substitution view, the vicarious punishment account, that is neither conceptually nor morally objectionable. On this view, the guilty person’s punishment consists in the suffering of an innocent to whom he or she bears a special relationship. Sinful humanity is punished through the inglorious death of Jesus Christ; ill-desert is thus requited, and an obstacle to unity with God is overcome
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Alexander Hyun (forthcoming). The Mystery of Atonement and Swinburne's Reparation Theory. Religious Studies:1-9.
Ryan W. Davis (2014). The Authority of God and the Meaning of the Atonement. Religious Studies 50 (4):405-423.
Similar books and articles
David Lewis (1997). Do We Believe in Penal Substitution? Philosophical Papers 26 (3):203 - 209.
Steven L. Porter (2004). Swinburnian Atonement and the Doctrine of Penal Substitution. Faith and Philosophy 21 (2):228-241.
Brent G. Kyle (2013). Punishing and Atoning: A New Critique of Penal Substitution. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (2):201-218.
Alan Brudner (2009). Punishment and Freedom: A Liberal Theory of Penal Justice. Oxford University Press.
Carlos Gómez-Jara, Communicative Retribution as a Constructivist Theory of Punishment - Penal Pain as a Communicative Artifact?
Christopher Bennett (2004). Punishment. Philosophical Books 45 (4):324-334.
Antony Duff (2003). Punishment, Communication and Community. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University
Alan Wertheimer (1977). Punishing the Innocent — Unintentionally. Inquiry 20 (1-4):45 – 65.
J. Brenton Stearns (1981). Divine Punishment and Reconciliation. Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (1):118-130.
Alan Brudner (2009). Punishment and Freedom. OUP Oxford.
Barbara Hudson (2003). Understanding Justice: An Introduction to Ideas, Perspectives, and Controversies in Modern Penal Theory. Open University Press.
J. Angelo Corlett (2001). Making Sense of Retributivism. Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
Julia Hillner (2008). Legal Punishment (O.F.) Robinson Penal Practice and Penal Policy in Ancient Rome. Pp. Viii + 255. London and New York: Routledge, 2007. Cased, £55, US$100. ISBN: 978-0-415-41651-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 58 (02):542-.
Patrick Lenta & Douglas Farland (2008). Desert, Justice and Capital Punishment. Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):273-290.
Jeremy Bentham (2009). The Rationale of Punishment. Prometheus Books.
Added to index2011-02-24
Total downloads66 ( #72,522 of 1,932,543 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #114,795 of 1,932,543 )
How can I increase my downloads?