Philosophy and interracial dialogue

Philosophical Forum 32 (2):107–124 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A philosophical approach to interracial dialogue in North America is based on moral and epistemological principles defended by James M. Jones, Lawrence Thomas, and Cornel West. The different perspectives of the racial majority and racial minorities give rise to different moral obligations

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2002

DOI

10.1111/0031-806x.00055

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Racial epithets: What we say and mean by them.Adam M. Croom - 2008 - Dialogue 51:34-45.
Racism: What It Is and What It Isn't.Lawrence Blum - 2002 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (3):203-218.
College students implicitly judge interracial sex and gay sex to be morally wrong.Joshua Knobe, Paul Bloom & David Pizarro - manuscript
Interracial Justice.W. J. Felix - 1937 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 12 (3):510-511.
Thanatic pornography, interracial rape, and the ku klux klan.T. Denean Sharpley-Whiting - 2003 - In Tommy Lee Lott & John P. Pittman (eds.), A Companion to African-American Philosophy. Blackwell.
Heidegger's comportment toward east-west dialogue.Lin Ma & J. Brakevanl - 2006 - Philosophy East and West 56 (4):519-566.
Is sexual desire raced?: The social meaning of interracial prostitution.Laurie Shrage - 1992 - Journal of Social Philosophy 23 (1):42-51.
Racism, social justice, and interracial coalitions.Howard Mcgary - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (3):249-264.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#595,031)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references