David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Law and Philosophy 16 (2):115 - 143 (1997)
The aim of this paper is to take the first steps toward providing a refurbished consent theory of political authority, one that rests in part on a reconception of the relationship between the surrender of judgment and the authoritativeness of political institutions. On the standard view, whatever grounds political authority implies that one ought to surrender one's judgment to that of one's political institutions. On the refurbished view, it is the surrender of one's judgment – which can plausibly be considered a form of consent – that makes political institutions practically authoritative.
|Keywords||authority political authority consent obligation political obligation law|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Véronique Munoz-Dardé (2009). Liberty's Chains. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):161-196.
Andrés Rosler (2005). Political Authority and Obligation in Aristotle. Oxford University Press.
William A. Edmundson (2011). Consent and Its Cousins. Ethics 121 (2):335-53.
Kevin Thompson (2001). Kant's Transcendental Deduction of Political Authority. Kant-Studien 92 (1):62-78.
Albena Azmanova (2012). The Scandal of Reason: A Critical Theory of Political Judgment. Columbia University Press.
C. M. (1997). Surrender of Judgment and the Consent Theory of Political Authority. Law and Philosophy 16 (2):115-143.
Fabienne Peter, Political Legitimacy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #32,926 of 1,088,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?