David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):W4-W5 (2010)
What sex is permissible, if any, in non-clinical research relationships? In reply to my call for a code of conduct for non-clinical research, some commentators have called for more training in such matters, but this kind of training will not go very far without some kind of governing standards yet to be determined. It is not enough to assume that unarticulated opinions will suffice. Neither will approaches that involve even greater scrutiny over research, as if to divide research into two categories: one in which sex with subjects is permissible and the other in which sex is impermissible. No practical solution to exploitation will be more important than having a code of ethics that guides decision-makers where institutional review bodies do not tread.
|Keywords||ethics research sex social sciences|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michael Dunn & Mark Sheehan (2010). No Sex Please, We're Social Scientists? American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):39-41.
Bridget Haire (2010). No Sex Please in Sexuality Research. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):43-44.
Hallie Liberto (2010). On the Costly Compromises of Nonclinical Research Relationships. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):41-42.
Timothy F. Murphy (2010). Sex, Romance, and Research Subjects: An Ethical Exploration. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):30-38.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mark E. Wojcik, The Wedding Bells Heard Around the World: Years From Now, Will We Wonder Why We Worried About Same-Sex Marriage?
Reginald Williams (2011). Same-Sex Marriage and Equality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):589-595.
Todd K. Shackelford, Gregory J. LeBlanc, Richard L. Michalski & Viviana A. Weekes (2000). Analyses of Mating Differences Within-Sex and Between-Sex Are Complementary, Not Competing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):621-621.
Stella Sandford (2010). Plato and Sex. Polity Press.
Robert Van Wyk (2011). Morality of Teenage Sex and its Implications for Sex Education. In Adrianne Leigh McEvoy (ed.), Sex, Love, and Friendship: Studies of the Society for the Philosophy of Sex and Love: 1993-2003. Rodopi.
Alan Hájek (1996). “Mises Redux” — Redux: Fifteen Arguments Against Finite Frequentism. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 45 (2-3):209--27.
Myra J. Hird (2004). Sex, Gender, and Science. Palgrave Macmillan.
Timothy F. Murphy (2013). Getting Past Nature as a Guide to the Human Sex Ratio. Bioethics 27 (4):224-232.
Added to index2010-07-12
Total downloads7 ( #175,123 of 1,096,465 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #139,663 of 1,096,465 )
How can I increase my downloads?