The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2009)
Over the last two decades, scientific accounts of religion have received a great deal of scholarly and popular attention both because of their intrinsic interest and because they are widely as constituting a threat to the religion they analyse. The Believing Primate aims to describe and discuss these scientific accounts as well as to assess their implications. The volume begins with essays by leading scientists in the field, describing these accounts and discussing evidence in their favour. Philosophical and theological reflections on these accounts follow, offered by leading philosophers, theologians, and scientists. This diverse group of scholars address some fascinating underlying questions: Do scientific accounts of religion undermine the justification of religious belief? Do such accounts show religion to be an accidental by-product of our evolutionary development? And, whilst we seem naturally disposed toward religion, would we fare better or worse without it? Bringing together dissenting perspectives, this provocative collection will serve to freshly illuminate ongoing debate on these perennial questions
|Keywords||Religion Human evolution Religious aspects|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$8.36 used (89% off) $72.38 new (1% off) $73.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BL430.B45 2009|
|ISBN(s)||9780199557028 0199557020 9780199597086|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
Peter van Inwagen, Explaining Belief in the Supernatural: Some Thoughts on Paul Bloom's 'Religious Belief as an Evolutionary Accident'.
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Helen De Cruz (2015). The Relevance of Hume's Natural History of Religion for Cognitive Science of Religion. Res Philosophica 92 (3):653-674.
Jonathan Jong & Aku Visala (2014). Evolutionary Debunking Arguments Against Theism, Reconsidered. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (3):243-258.
Max Baker-Hytch (forthcoming). Mutual Epistemic Dependence and the Demographic Divine Hiddenness Problem. Religious Studies:1-20.
David Leech & Aku Visala (2011). The Cognitive Science of Religion: Implications for Theism? Zygon 46 (1):47-64.
David Leech & Aku Visala (2011). Naturalistic Explanation for Religious Belief. Philosophy Compass 6 (8):552-563.
Similar books and articles
Arie L. Molendijk & Peter Pels (eds.) (1998). Religion in the Making: The Emergence of the Sciences of Religion. Brill.
N. Everitt (2010). The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion, Edited by Jeffrey Schloss and Michael Murray. Mind 119 (475):849-852.
Benjamin Murphy (2011). The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion. Edited by Jeffrey Schloss and Michael Murray. Heythrop Journal 52 (2):325-326.
Candace S. Alcorta (2011). The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):233-236.
Jacques Derrida (2002). Acts of Religion. Routledge.
Xiaomei Yang (2008). Some Issues in Chinese Philosophy of Religion. Philosophy Compass 3 (3):551–569.
Joshua C. Thurow (2013). Does Cognitive Science Show Belief in God to Be Irrational? The Epistemic Consequences of the Cognitive Science of Religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):77-98.
D. Z. Phillips (ed.) (1996). Religion and Morality. St. Martin's Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #153,313 of 1,780,225 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,765 of 1,780,225 )
How can I increase my downloads?