The democratic potential of confucian minben thought

Asian Philosophy 10 (1):33 – 47 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue that although the Confucian idea of 'minben' is not synonymous with democracy, some its tenets are conducive to the promotion of a regime in which citizens are politically and economically empowered. In particular, I focus on the way that Confucius, Mencius and Jia Yi stress that government should meet the basic needs of its people. Material well-being is an important precondition of democracy that is often overlooked in contemporary discussions of Chinese government, which usually focus on negative rights or the authoritarian state.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Early Confucianism Cannot Generate Democracy.David Elstein - 2010 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (4):427-443.
A basic Mencius: the wisdom and advice of China's second sage. Mencius - 2006 - South San Francisco, CA: Long River Press. Edited by Kuijie Zhou.
Confucian Democracy and Equality.Ranjoo Seodu Herr - 2010 - Asian Philosophy 20 (3):261-282.
Confucian skepticism about workplace rights.Alan Strudler - 2008 - Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (1):67-83.
Plato, Hegel, and Democracy.Thom Brooks - 2006 - Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 53:24-50.
Confucian ethics and japanese management practices.Marc J. Dollinger - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (8):575 - 584.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
40 (#388,897)

6 months
11 (#222,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references