Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (1):85-89 (2011)
|Abstract||There are two kinds of semantic theories of anaphora. Some, such as Heim’s File Change Semantics, Groenendijk and Stokhof’s Dynamic Predicate Logic, or Muskens’ Compositional DRT (CDRT), seem to require full coindexing of anaphora and their antecedents prior to interpretation. Others, such as Kamp’s Discourse Representation Theory (DRT), do not require this coindexing and seem to have an important advantage here. In this squib I will sketch a procedure that the first group of theories may help themselves to so that they can interleave interpretation and coindexing in DRT’s way|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Reinhard Muskens (1995). Tense and the Logic of Change. In [Book Chapter].
Reinhard Muskens (1991). Anaphora and the Logic of Change. In [Book Chapter].
Anna Szabolcsi (2003). Binding On the Fly: Cross-Sentential Anaphora in Variable— Free Semantics. In R. Oehrle & J. Kruijff (eds.), Resource Sensitivity, Binding, and Anaphora. Kluwer.
Adrian Brasoveanu (2008). Donkey Pluralities: Plural Information States Versus Non-Atomic Individuals. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (2):129-209.
Myriam Bras & Laure Vieu (eds.) (2001). Semantic and Pragmatic Issues in Discourse and Dialogue: Experimenting with Current Dynamic Theories. Elsevier.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen & J. P. Smit (2010). Anaphora and Semantic Innocence. Journal of Semantics 27 (1).
Peter Pagin & Dag Westerståhl (1993). Predicate Logic with Flexibly Binding Operators and Natural Language Semantics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2 (2):89-128.
J. P. Smit & A. Steglich-Petersen (2010). Anaphora and Semantic Innocence. Journal of Semantics 27 (1):119-124.
Irene Heim (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Dissertation, UMass Amherst
Added to index2011-07-16
Total downloads17 ( #71,160 of 549,571 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,571 )
How can I increase my downloads?