Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):543-558 (2005)
|Abstract||Abstract The neo?Gramscian framework offers one of the more innovative contributions to a discipline long embedded in the self?same verities of behaviouralism, positivism and neo?Realism. As with conventional wisdom, however, neo?Gramscians reproduce either assumptions of liberal neutrality or cultural thickness in relation to the ?peripheral zones? of the global political economy. These tendencies produce a variant that can be likened to ?soft Orientalism?. In the first instance, cultural difference is not much of an impediment to the establishment of (West?centred) global hegemony. In the second instance, otherness becomes the principal source of counter?hegemonic movements or resistance. This article provides a Gramscian rereading of these antinomies in relation to the apparent consolidation of a natural attitude towards Islam in the wake of recent dramatic events|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edward Said (1979). Orientalism. Vintage.
James Robinson, Reification and Hegemony : The Politics of Culture in the Writings of Georg Lukács and Antonio Gramsci, 1918-1938.
Rosemary Dore (2009). Gramscian Thought and Brazilian Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (6):712-731.
Peter Ives (2005). Language, Agency and Hegemony: A Gramscian Response to Post‐Marxism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):455-468.
A. Claire Cutler (2005). Gramsci, Law, and the Culture of Global Capitalism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):527-542.
Maurice A. Finocchiaro (1984). Gramsci: An Alternative Communism? Studies in East European Thought 27 (2):123-146.
Ahmet Öncü (2003). Dictatorship Plus Hegemony: A Gramscian Analysis of the Turkish State. Science and Society 67 (3):303 - 328.
Ivan Manokha (2006). Business Ethics and the Spirit of Global Capitalism: Moral Leadership in the Context of Global Hegemony. Journal of Global Ethics 2 (1):27 – 41.
Andreas Bieler (2005). Class Struggle Over the EU Model of Capitalism: Neo‐Gramscian Perspectives and the Analysis of European Integration. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):513-526.
William I. Robinson (2005). Gramsci and Globalisation: From Nation‐State to Transnational Hegemony. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (4):559-574.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads28 ( #49,809 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?