Noa's ark--fine for realism
Philosophical Quarterly 39 (157):383-398 (1989)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHoward Sankey (2006). Why is It Rational to Believe Scientific Theories Are True? In Colin Cheyne & John Worrall (eds.), Rationality and Reality: Conversations with Alan Musgrave. Springer.
Arthur Fine (1996). The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory. University of Chicago Press.
Soazig Le Bihan (2009). Fine's Ways to Fail to Secure Local Realism. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (2):142-150.
Joseph Rouse (1991). The Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 58 (4):607-627.
William Newton-Smith (1988). Modest Realism. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:179 - 189.
Sami Pihlström (1996). Getting Ontologically Natural. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (3):247-256.
Richard H. Schlagel (1991). Fine's "Shaky Game" (And Why NOA Is No Ark for Science):The Shaky Game Arthur Fine. Philosophy of Science 58 (2):307-.
Richard H. Schlagel (1991). Review: Fine's "Shaky Game" (And Why NOA Is No Ark for Science). [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 58 (2):307 - 323.
Sharon L. Crasnow (2000). How Natural Can Ontology Be? Philosophy of Science 67 (1):114-132.
Joseph Rouse (1988). Arguing for the Natural Ontological Attitude. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:294 - 301.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads42 ( #27,015 of 549,060 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,186 of 549,060 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
