David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 20 (1):43 – 63 (2007)
In this paper a theoretical framework is proposed for how the brain processes the information necessary for us to achieve the understanding of others that we experience in our social worlds. Our framework attempts to expand several previous approaches to more fully account for the various data on interpersonal understanding and to respond to theoretical critiques in this area. Specifically, we propose that social understanding must be achieved by at least two mechanisms in the brain that are capable of parallel information processing. The first mechanism, based on research into mirror matching systems in the brain, suggests that representations of others are mapped onto an observer's representations of these same schemas in order to understand them. The second mechanism requires semantic analysis of a given social situation in order to understand the actions of others and most likely involves conscious processes. We suggest that experimental correlates of these systems should be dissociable using both behavioral and neuroimaging techniques.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jerome Barkow, Leda Cosmides & John Tooby (eds.) (1992). The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. Oxford University Press.
Vittorio Gallese (2005). Embodied Simulation: From Neurons to Phenomenal Experience. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (1):23-48.
Vittorio Gallese (2000). The Acting Subject: Toward the Neural Basis of Social Cognition. In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Neural Correlates of Consciousness. MIT Press. 325--333.
Vittorio Gallese (2001). The 'Shared Manifold' Hypothesis: From Mirror Neurons to Empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (5-7):33-50.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jeremy I. M. Carpendale & Charlie Lewis (2004). Constructing an Understanding of Mind: The Development of Children's Social Understanding Within Social Interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):79-96.
Robin Banerjee (2004). The Role of Social Experience in Advanced Social Understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):97-98.
Shimon Edelman (2001). Neural Spaces: A General Framework for the Understanding of Cognition? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):664-665.
Marc F. Joanisse & Todd R. Haskell (1999). The Dual-Mechanism Model of Inflectional Morphology: A Connectionist Critique. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1026-1027.
John Michael (2012). Mirror Neurons and Social Cognition: An Expanded Simulationist Framework. In. In Henk W. de Regt (ed.), Epsa Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. 217--226.
Machiel Keestra (2011). Understanding Human Action: Integrating Meanings, Mechanisms, Causes, and Contexts. In Repko Allen, Szostak Rick & Newell William (eds.), Interdisciplinary Research: Case Studies of Integrative Understandings of Complex Problems. Sage.
Axel Cleeremans (2006). Computational Correlates of Consciousness. In Steven Laureys (ed.), The Boundaries of Consciousness: Neurobiology and Neuropathology: Progress in Brain Research. Elsevier.
Arlene S. Walker-Andrews & Judith A. Hudson (2004). Interpretation Based on Richness of Experience: Theory Development From a Social-Constructivist Perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):128-129.
Douglas K. Symons (2004). The Internalization of Mental State Discourse Contributes to Social Understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):125-126.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #424,058 of 1,096,818 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?