David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History and Theory 46 (2):194–200 (2007)
This article comments on some of Professor Huang’s theses by looking at ancient historiography. It deals with the significance of history in its respective cultural contexts; the kind of orientation that historical thinking and historiography provide; and the relationship between concrete examples and abstract rules in historical argumentation. Distinguishing between ancient Greece and Rome, it shows that Huang’s explicit and implicit East–West oppositions are more valid with respect to ancient Greece than to ancient Rome. On important points, the situation of Rome is surprisingly close to that of China. Thus not only in China but also in Rome, tradition and history are highly important as a life-orienting force ; and not only in China but also in Rome the orientation that historical thinking and historiography provide is to a great extent moral . As to the relationship between concrete examples and abstract rules in historical argumentation, the paper takes up Professor Rüsen’s category of “exemplary meaning-generation,” but suggests a distinction between example in the sense of “case/instance” and example in the sense of “model/paragon.” Though the two corresponding modes of exemplary meaning-generation are mostly entwined, it appears that in Chinese and Roman historical works there is a tendency toward meaning-generation by example in the sense of “model/paragon,” whereas in Greek historiography the tendency is toward meaning-generation by example in the sense of “case/instance.”
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Roy W. Perrett (1998). Truth, Relativism and Western Conceptions of Indian Philosophy. Asian Philosophy 8 (1):19 – 29.
Deborah Woo (1991). China's Importation of Western Psychiatry: Cultural Relativity and Mental Disorders. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (1).
Carmelo Calì (2005). Husserl and the Phenomenological Description of Imagery: Some Issues for the Cognitive Sciences? ARHE 2 (4):25-37.
Jan Westerhoff (2004). The Construction of Ontological Categories. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):595 – 620.
Steven Shankman (2010). Other Others: Levinas, Literature, Transcultural Studies. State University of New York Press.
Robert E. Allinson (ed.) (1989). Understanding the Chinese Mind: The Philosophical Roots. Oxford University Press.
Jonathan W. Schofer (1993). Virtues in Xunzi's Thought. Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (1):117 - 136.
Lü Yaohuai & Huang Deyuan (2008). The Tradition of the Virtue of Qian and Its Contemporary Fate. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):558 - 576.
Yaohuai Lü (2008). The Tradition of the Virtue of Qian and its Contemporary Fate. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):558-576.
Steven Shankman (2002). The Legalist Betrayal of the Confucian Other : Sima Qian's Portrayal of Qin Shihuangdi. In Steven Shankman & Massimo Lollini (eds.), Who, Exactly, is the Other ?: Western and Transcultural Perspectives: A Collection of Essays. University of Oregon Books/University of Oregon Humanities Center
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #592,387 of 1,790,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #424,764 of 1,790,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?