Graduate studies at Western
Phronesis 45 (3):205 - 219 (2000)
|Abstract||Contrary to what most interpreters hold, in the "Nicomachean Ethics" Aristotle is not committed to the view that people of established vicious character could never become good. The present paper proves this result (1) by giving a better reading of 1114 a 12-21, a passage which has traditionally been taken to assert that unjust and self-indulgent people are doomed to a lifetime of vice; (2) by showing that when Aristotle refers to self-indulgent people as "incurable", he does not mean that they could never change, but only that they could not change as a result of external influences such as persuasion or punishment; (3) by proving that although Aristotle regards the desires of vicious people as determined by their character, there is room within Aristotelian moral psychology for the possibility that people of corrupt character become motivated to begin a process of moral reform|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gianluca Di Muzio (2000). Aristotle on Improving One's Character. Phronesis 45 (3):205 - 219.
Gianluca di Muzio (2000). Aristotle on Improving One's Character. Phronesis 45 (3):205-219.
Gianluca di Muzio (2008). Aristotle's Alleged Moral Determinism in the Nicoachean Ethics. Journal of Philosophical Research 33:19-32.
Joyce L. Jenkins (1999). The Advantages of Civic Friendship. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:459-471.
Nancy Sherman (1989). The Fabric of Character: Aristotle's Theory of Virtue. Oxford University Press.
Anthony Carreras (2012). Aristotle on Other-Selfhood and Reciprocal Shaping. History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (4):319-336.
Jonathan Jacobs (1997). Plasticity and Perfection: Maimonides and Aristotle on Character. Religious Studies 33 (4):443-454.
Shane Drefcinski (2011). What Kind of Cause Is Music's Influence on Moral Character? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2):287-296.
Anna Marmodoro (2011). Moral Character Versus Situations: An Aristotelian Contribution to the Debate. Journal of Ancient Philosophy 5 (2).
Paul Lewis (2012). In Defence of Aristotle on Character: Toward a Synthesis of Recent Psychology, Neuroscience and the Thought of Michael Polanyi. Journal of Moral Education 41 (2):155-170.
Kurt Pritzl (2006). The Place of Intellect in Aristotle. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:57-75.
William Bondeson (1974). Aristotle on Responsibility for One's Character and the Possibility of Character Change. Phronesis 19 (1):59 - 65.
William Bondeson (1974). Aristotle on Responsibility for One's Character and the Possibility of Character Change. Phronesis 19 (1):59-65.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads3 ( #213,731 of 739,349 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,349 )
How can I increase my downloads?