David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (11):635-638 (2006)
Among bioethicists and members of the public, genetics is often regarded as unique in its ethical challenges. As medical researchers and clinicians increasingly combine genetic information with a range of non-genetic information in the study and clinical management of patients with common diseases, the unique ethical challenges attributed to genetics must be re-examined. A process of genetic routinisation that will have implications for research and clinical ethics, as well as for public conceptions of genetic information, is constituted by the emergence of new forms of genetic medicine, in which genetic information is interpreted in a multifactorial frame of reference. Although the integration of genetics in medical research and treatment may be a helpful corrective to the mistaken assumptions of genetic essentialism or determinism, the routinisation of genetics may have unintended consequences for the protection of genetic information, perceptions of non-genetic information and the loss of genetic research as a laboratory for exploring issues in research and clinical ethics. Consequently, new ethical challenges are presented by the increasing routinisation of genetic information in both biomedical and public spheres
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Richard R. Sharp & Morris W. Foster (2006). Clinical Utility and Full Disclosure of Genetic Results to Research Participants. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):42 – 44.
Similar books and articles
Antonio Marturano & Ruth Chadwick (2004). How the Role of Computing is Driving New Genetics' Public Policy. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):43-53.
Robert Streiffer (2005). An Ethical Analysis of Ojibway Objections to Genomics and Genetics Research on Wild Rice. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):37-45.
Jordan Bartol (2013). Re-Examining the Gene in Personalized Genomics. Science and Education 22 (10):2529-2546.
Herman T. Tavani (2004). Genomic Research and Data-Mining Technology: Implications for Personal Privacy and Informed Consent. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):15-28.
John Dupré (2004). Understanding Contemporary Genomics. Perspectives on Science 12 (3):320-338.
Jennifer Marshall, The Development of Contemporary Medical Genetics Research Models and the Need for Scientific Responsibility.
Jeffrey H. Barker (2003). Common-Pool Resources and Population Genomics in Iceland, Estonia, and Tonga. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (2):133-144.
Maurizio Salvi (2002). Genetics' Dreams in the Post Genomics Era. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):73-77.
Fiona O'Neill (2006). Fashioning Flesh : Inclusion, Exclusivity, and the Potential of Genomics. In Paul Atkinson (ed.), New Genetics, New Indentities. Routledge
John C. Ruhnka & Steven Weller (1990). The Ethical Implications of Corporate Records Management Practices and Some Suggested Ethical Values for Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):81 - 92.
Bartha Maria Knoppers (ed.) (2003). Populations and Genetics: Legal and Socio-Ethical Perspectives. Martinus Nijhoff.
Mildred K. Cho (2008). Understanding Incidental Findings in the Context of Genetics and Genomics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2):280-285.
Stefan Helmreich (2009). Promising Genomics: Iceland and deCODE Genetics in a World of Speculation (Review). Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52 (3):477-479.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads7 ( #507,430 of 1,940,952 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,800 of 1,940,952 )
How can I increase my downloads?