David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (2):239-254 (2001)
Zoologist A. J. Cain began historical research on Linnaeus in 1956 in connection with his dissatisfaction over the standard taxonomic hierarchy and the rules of binomial nomenclature. His famous 1958 paper ‘Logic and Memory in Linnaeus's System of Taxonomy’ argues that Linnaeus was following Aristotle's method of logical division without appreciating that it properly applies only to ‘analysed entities’ such as geometric figures whose essential nature is already fully known. The essence of living things being unanalysed, there is no basis on which to choose the right characters to define a genus nor on which to differentiate species. Yet Cain's understanding of Aristotle, which depended on a 1916 text by H. W. B. Joseph, was fatally flawed. In the 1990s Cain devoted himself to further historical study and softened his verdict on Linnaeus, praising his empiricism. The idea that Linnaeus was applying an ancient and inappropriate method cries out for fresh study and revision
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Anna-K. Mayer (2004). Setting Up a Discipline, II: British History of Science and “the End of Ideology”, 1931–1948. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (1):41-72.
Charissa S. Varma (2009). Threads That Guide or Ties That Bind: William Kirby and the Essentialism Story. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 42 (1):119 - 149.
Similar books and articles
P. M. (2001). Cain on Linnaeus: The Scientist-Historian as Unanalysed Entity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (2):239-254.
Ross Hoffman (1940). Historian and Scientist. Thought 15 (2):325-326.
Bill Cain (1992). Bill Cain on the Conference. Clr James Journal 3 (1):7-16.
André Deprit (1953). Algebraic Structure of the Set Theory of Unanalysed Propositions. Philosophical Studies 3:67-75.
Paul S. Olmstead (1948). Some Thoughts on "What the Natural Scientist Needs From the Social Scientist". Philosophy of Science 15 (2):85-86.
Richard Rudner (1953). The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments. Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-6.
John Arthur Passmore (1958). The Objectivity of History. Philosophy 33 (125):97 - 111.
Alon Segev (2008). The Absolute and the Failure to Think of the Ontological Difference. Studia Phaenomenologica 8:453-472.
Peter Harrison (2009). Linnaeus as a Second Adam? Taxonomy and the Religious Vocation. Zygon 44 (4):879-893.
John Takman (1957). Notes on Linnaeus. Science and Society 21 (3):193 - 209.
Achille C. Varzi (2003). Naming the Stages. Dialectica 57 (4):387–412.
Howard Sankey (2012). Reference, Success and Entity Realism. Kairos 5:31-42.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads13 ( #141,570 of 1,692,619 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #181,402 of 1,692,619 )
How can I increase my downloads?