Hypatia 28 (3):533-550 (2013)
|Abstract||Many commentators have contrasted the way that sociability is theorized in the writings of Mary Astell and Damaris Masham, emphasizing the extent to which Masham is more interested in embodied, worldly existence. I argue, by contrast, that Astell's own interest in imagining a constitutively relational individual emerges once we pay attention to her use of religious texts and tropes. To explore the relevance of Astell's Christianity, I emphasize both how Astell's Christianity shapes her view of the individual's relation to society and how Masham's contrasting views can be analyzed through the lens of her charge that Astell is an “enthusiast.” In late seventeenth-century England, “enthusiasm” was a term of abuse that, commentators have recently argued, could function polemically to dismiss those deemed either excessively social or antisocial. By accusing Astell of enthusiasm, I claim, Masham seeks to marginalize the relational self that Astell imagines and to promote a more instrumental view of social ties. I suggest some aspects of Astell's thought that may have struck contemporaries as “enthusiastic” and contrast her vision of the self with Masham's more hedonistic subject. I conclude that, although each woman differently configures the relation between self and society, they share a desire to imagine autonomy within a relational framework|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Penny A. Weiss (2004). Mary Astell: Including Women's Voices in Political Theory. Hypatia 19 (3):63-84.
Catherine Wilson (2004). Love of God and Love of Creatures: The Masham-Astell Debate. History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (3):281 - 298.
Cynthia B. Bryson (1998). Mary Astell: Defender of the "Disembodied Mind". Hypatia 13 (4):40 - 62.
Jacqueline Broad (2002). Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge University Press.
Lois Frankel (1989). Damaris Cudworth Masham: A Seventeenth Century Feminist Philosopher. Hypatia 4 (1):80 - 90.
Alessa Johns (1996). Mary Astell's 'Excited Needles': Theorizing Feminist Utopia in Seventeenth-Century England. Utopian Studies 7 (1):60 - 74.
Regan Penaluna (2010). Mary Astell. The Philosopher's Magazine 51 (51):98-100.
Alice Sowaal, Mary Astell. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Kathleen M. Squadrito (1987). Mary Astell's Critique of Locke's View of Thinking Matter. Journal of the History of Philosophy 25 (3):433-439.
Alice Sowaal (2007). Mary Astell's Serious Proposal: Mind, Method, and Custom. Philosophy Compass 2 (2):227–243.
Alice Sowaal (2008). Mary Astell: Theorist of Freedom From Domination. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 322-323.
Deborah Boyle (2007). Mary Astell: Theorist of Freedom From Domination - by Patricia Springborg. Philosophical Books 48 (4):359-360.
Marcy P. Lascano (2011). Damaris Masham and 'The Law of Reason or Nature'. The Modern Schoolman 88 (3/4):245-265.
Sarah Ellenzweig (2003). The Love of God and the Radical Enlightenment: Mary Astell's Brush with Spinoza. Journal of the History of Ideas 64 (3):379-397.
Sarah Hutton, Lady Damaris Masham. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2012-05-01
Total downloads6 ( #154,770 of 722,929 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,929 )
How can I increase my downloads?