David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 29 (July):285-291 (1962)
The notion that there is a category mistake or some other conceptual confusion in regarding seeing, hearing, and other forms of perception as events, states, or processes is incorrect. Ryle's analysis of "seeing" as an achievement word does not rule out our regarding seeing as an event, but in fact suggests that we do so when we carry the analysis beyond the point where Ryle leaves it. Furthermore there are uses of "see" not noticed by Ryle which justify our saying that within certain contexts seeing is a state and within other contexts a process. The question of what these events, states, and processes are cannot be met without recognizing a fundamental duality of aspect that characterizes perception. This duality can be formulated in terms of the way perception is known. One who observes a perceiver knows the perceiver's perception in a categorically different way than the perceiver knows it. From this it can be seen that perceptual events, states, and processes have both a physical aspect and an epistemological aspect. Any attempt to reduce one of these aspects to the other would involve a category mistake
|Keywords||Category Mistake Epistemology Mind Perception Process Seeing Ryle, G|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gilbert Ryle (1949/2002). The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson and Co.
Philip Bashor & Arifa Farid (1987). Deliberate Commission of Category Mistake. Crombie Vs. Ryle. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 21 (1):39 - 46.
Massimo Grassia (2004). Consciousness and Perceptual Attention: A Methodological Argument. Essays in Philosophy 5 (1):1-23.
Thomas W. Bestor (1979). Gilbert Ryle and the Adverbial Theory of Mind. Personalist 60 (July):233-242.
Helen Steward (1997). The Ontology of Mind: Events, Processes, and States. Oxford University Press.
Mark L. Conkling (1977). Ryle's Mistake About Consciousness. Philosophy Today 21 (4):376-388.
Rowland Stout, Penultimate Draft of “Two Ways to Understand Causality in Agency”, for Anton Leist (Ed.), Action in Context.
Margaret Macdonald (1951). Professor Ryle on the Concept of Mind. Philosophical Review 60 (January):80-90.
William E. Lyons (1980). Gilbert Ryle: An Introduction To His Philosophy. Sussex: Harvester Press.
Albert Hofstadter (1951). Professor Ryle's Category-Mistake. Journal of Philosophy 48 (April):257-269.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #55,450 of 1,700,324 )
Recent downloads (6 months)20 ( #36,129 of 1,700,324 )
How can I increase my downloads?