Religious Studies 39 (4):427-430 (2003)
|Abstract||While I may have misunderstood certain points in Craig's Molinist theodicy, a careful reading of my article will show that Craig is incorrect in his claim that I have failed to evaluate his proposal on the basis of its asserted standard: plausibility. The heart of my argument is that Craig's theodicy is implausible because it fails to provide a credible explanation of the culpability of all non-believers. In this rejoinder I try to show (1) why an evidentialist exoneration of reflective disbelievers (in Christ) also applies, contra Craig, to the unevangelized; and (2) that an evidentialist account of reflective disbelief is more plausible than Craig's sinful-resistance account.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William Lane Craig (2005). Is “Craig's Contentious Suggestion” Really so Implausible? Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):358-362.
William Lane Craig (1994). Robert Adams's New Anti-Molinist Argument. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):857-861.
Graham Oppy (2002). Arguing About The Kalam Cosmological Argument. Philo 5 (1):34-61.
Paul Helm (2002). Time and Time Again: Two Volumes by William Lane Craig William Lane Craig the Tensed Theory of Time: A Critical Examination. Synthese Library Volume 293. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000). Pp. V+287. £78.00 (Hbk). ISBN 0792366344. William Lane Craig the Tenseless Theory of Time: A Critical Examination. Synthese Library Volume 294. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000). Pp. V+256. £65.00 (Hbk). ISBN 0792366352. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 38 (4):489-498.
William Hasker (1997). Explanatory Priority: Transitive and Unequivocal, a Reply to William Craig. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):389-393.
Raymond J. VanArragon (2001). Transworld Damnation and Craig's Contentious Suggestion. Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):241-260.
Charles Seymour (2000). A Craigian Theodicy of Hell. Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):103-115.
Wes Morriston (2002). Craig on the Actual Infinite. Religious Studies 38 (2):147-166.
David B. Myers (2003). Exclusivism, Eternal Damnation, and the Problem of Evil: A Critique of Craig's Molinist Soteriological Theodicy. Religious Studies 39 (4):407-419.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #114,230 of 549,683 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,683 )
How can I increase my downloads?