The difference totality makes. Reconsidering Pannenberg's eschatological ontology
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Wolfhart Pannenberg's eschatological ontology has been criticised for undermining the goodness and reality of finite creaturely differentiation. Drawing on David Bentley Hart's recent ontological proposal, this article explores the critique of Pannenberg's ontology, and offers a defence of Pannenberg's depiction of the relationship between difference and totality, especially as it is presented in his 1988 work, Metaphysics and the Idea of God. In this work, Pannenberg articulates a structured relationship between difference and totality in which individual finite particularities are preserved and affirmed within a coherent semantic whole. Creaturely differences are not sublated or eliminated in the eschatological totality, but they are integrated into a harmonious totality of meaning. This view of the semantic function of totality can be further clarified by drawing an analogy between Pannenberg's ontological vision and Robert W. Jenson's model of the eschatological consummation as a narrative conclusion to the drama of finite reality.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Wolfhart Pannenberg (2002). The Concept of Miracle. Zygon 37 (3):759-762.
Peter Pagin (2006). Meaning Holism. In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oup Oxford.
Peter M. Sullivan (2000). The Totality of Facts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (2):175–192.
C. S. J. Elizabeth A. Johnson (1983). Resurrection and Reality in the Thought of Wolfhart Pannenberg. Heythrop Journal 24 (1):1–18.
Linn Tonstad (2009). »The Ultimate Consequence of His Self-Distinction From the Father. . . «: Difference and Hierarchy in Pannenberg's Trinity. [REVIEW] Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 51 (4):383-399.
Robert John Russell (1988). Contingency in Physics and Cosmology: A Critique of the Theology of Wolfhart Pannenberg. Zygon 23 (1):23-43.
Silvia Benso (2012). Joy Beyond Boredom : Totality and Infinity as a Work of Wonder. In Scott Davidson & Diane Perpich (eds.), Totality and Infinity at 50. Duquesne University Press.
F. LeRon Shults (2001). Theology, Science, and Relationality: Interdisciplinary Reciprocity in the Work of Wolfhart Pannenberg. Zygon 36 (4):809-825.
Simon Lumsden (2000). Absolute Difference and Social Ontology: Levinas Face to Face with Buber and Fichte. [REVIEW] Human Studies 23 (3):227-241.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #270,402 of 1,693,218 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?