International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):7 – 24 (2003)
|Abstract||Recent literature on Bohm's alternative to mainstream quantum mechanics may create the misleading impression that, except for perfunctory dismissals, the theory was ignored by the physics community in the years immediately following its proposal. As a matter of fact, Einstein, Pauli, and Heisenberg all published criticisms of Bohm's theory, explaining their reasons for not accepting the theory. These criticisms will be discussed and evaluated in this article.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marcello Guarini (2003). Bohm's Metaphors, Causality, and the Quantum Potential. Erkenntnis 59 (1):77 - 95.
Jeffrey A. Barrett (2000). The Persistence of Memory: Surreal Trajectories in Bohm's Theory. Philosophy of Science 67 (4):680-703.
Jeffrey A. Barrett (1995). The Distribution Postulate in Bohm's Theory. Topoi 14 (1):45-54.
R. I. G. Hughes (2006). Theoretical Practice: The Bohm-Pines Quartet. Perspectives on Science 14 (4):457-524.
Tim Oliver Eynck, Holger Lyre & Nicolai von Rummell, A Versus B! Topological Nonseparability and the Aharonov-Bohm Effect.
David Bohm (2003). The Essential David Bohm. Routledge.
Frederick M. Kronz (1998). Bohm's Ontological Interpretation and its Relations to Three Formulations of Quantum Mechanics. Synthese 117 (1):31-52.
Peter J. Lewis (2007). Empty Waves in Bohmian Quantum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):787 - 803.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #90,445 of 722,765 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,438 of 722,765 )
How can I increase my downloads?