The categorical imperative and the ethics of trust
Ethics and Information Technology 10 (4) (2008)
| Abstract | Trust can be understood as a precondition for a well-functioning society or as a way to handle complexities of living in a risk society, but also as a fundamental aspect of human morality. Interactions on the Internet pose some new challenges to issues of trust, especially connected to disembodiedness. Mistrust may be an important obstacle to Internet use, which is problematic as the Internet becomes a significant arena for political, social and commercial activities necessary for full participation in a liberal democracy. The Categorical Imperative lifts up trust as a fundamental component of human ethical virtues – first of all, because deception and coercion, the antitheses of trust, cannot be universalized. Mistrust is, according to Kant, a natural component of human nature, as we are social beings dependent on recognition by others but also prone to deceiving others. Only in true friendships can this tendency be overcome and give room for unconditional trust. Still we can argue that Kant must hold that trustworthy behaviour as well as trust in others is obligatory, as expressions of respect for humanity. The Kantian approach integrates political and ethical aspects of trust, showing that protecting the external activities of citizens is required in order to act morally. This means that security measures, combined with specific regulations are important preconditions for building online trust, providing an environment enabling people to act morally and for trust-based relationships. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMatteo Turilli, Antonino Vaccaro & Mariarosaria Taddeo (2010). The Case of Online Trust. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 23 (3-4):333-345.
George G. Brenkert (1998). Trust, Morality and International Business. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):293-317.
Waymond Rodgers (2010). Three Primary Trust Pathways Underlying Ethical Considerations. Journal of Business Ethics 91 (1):83 - 93.
Colin Rule & Larry Friedberg (2005). The Appropriate Role of Dispute Resolution in Building Trust Online. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):193-205.
Marek Kohn (2008). Trust: Self-Interest and the Common Good. Oxford University Press.
Bryan W. Husted (1998). The Ethical Limits of Trust in Business Relations. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):233-248.
Harry Hummels & Hans E. Roosendaal (2001). Trust in Scientific Publishing. Journal of Business Ethics 34 (2):87 - 100.
Trudy Govier (1993). Self-Trust, Autonomy, and Self-Esteem. Hypatia 8 (1):99 - 120.
Mark Coeckelbergh (2012). Can We Trust Robots? Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):53-60.
Robert C. Solomon (1998). Creating Trust. Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):205-232.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads51 ( #20,496 of 549,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,007 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
