Σ2 -collection and the infinite injury priority method

Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (1):212-221 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show that the existence of a recursively enumerable set whose Turing degree is neither low nor complete cannot be proven from the basic axioms of first order arithmetic (P -) together with Σ 2 -collection (BΣ 2 ). In contrast, a high (hence, not low) incomplete recursively enumerable set can be assembled by a standard application of the infinite injury priority method. Similarly, for each n, the existence of an incomplete recursively enumerable set that is neither low n nor high n - 1 , while true, cannot be established in P - + BΣ n + 1 . Consequently, no bounded fragment of first order arithmetic establishes the facts that the high n and low n jump hierarchies are proper on the recursively enumerable degrees

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The infinite injury priority method.Robert I. Soare - 1976 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (2):513-530.
Finite injury and Σ1-induction.Michael Mytilinaios - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (1):38 - 49.
A Fine Structure in the Theory of Isols.Joseph Barback - 1998 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 44 (2):229-264.
Topological framework for finite injury.Kyriakos Kontostathis - 1992 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 38 (1):189-195.
On Infinite Number and Distance.Jeremy Gwiazda - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):126-130.
A causal model for causal priority.Martin Bunzl - 1984 - Erkenntnis 21 (1):31 - 44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#419,437)

6 months
13 (#185,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references