Pacific Philosophical Quarterly (forthcoming)
|Abstract||On a natural reading of the major accounts of love, love is a kind of mental state or event. A recent trend in the philosophical literature on love is to reject these accounts on the basis that they do not do justice to the historical dimension of love, as love essentially involves a distinctive kind of temporally extended pattern. Although the historicist account has advantages over the positions that it opposes, its appeal to the notion of a pattern is problematic. I will argue that an account of love as disposition,suitably construed, is superior to the historicist account in that it has the advantages the historicist account has without its problems. In addition, the dispositional account has advantages of its own.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Troy A. Jollimore (2011). Love's Vision. Princeton University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A Secret History. Yale University Press.
S. Matthew Liao (2006). The Idea of a Duty to Love. Journal of Value Inquiry 40 (1):1-22.
Carolyn Price (2012). What is the Point of Love? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2):217-237.
Bennett W. Helm, Love. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Christopher Grau (2010). Love and History. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):246-271.
Joseph Clair (2013). Wolterstorff on Love and Justice. Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):138-167.
Sharon Krishek (2008). Two Forms of Love: The Problem of Preferential Love in Kierkegaard's Works of Love. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):595-617.
Marguerite La Caze (2005). Love, That Indispensable Supplement: Irigaray and Kant on Love and Respect. Hypatia 20 (3):92-114.
Roger E. Lamb (ed.) (1997). Love Analyzed. Westview Press.
Added to index2012-08-02
Total downloads32 ( #37,982 of 549,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?