David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3):342-357 (2013)
On a naive reading of the major accounts of love, love is a kind of mental event. A recent trend in the philosophical literature on love is to reject these accounts on the basis that they do not do justice to the historical dimension of love, as love essentially involves a distinctive kind of temporally extended pattern. Although the historicist account has advantages over the positions that it opposes, its appeal to the notion of a pattern is problematic. I will argue that an account of love as disposition, suitably construed, is superior to the historicist account in that it has the advantages the historicist account has without its problems. In addition, the dispositional account has advantages of its own
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
B. D. Ellis (2001). Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge University Press.
W. V. Quine (1960). Word and Object. The MIT Press.
Nelson Goodman (1983). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Harvard University Press.
Gilbert Ryle (1949/2002). The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson and Co.
George Molnar (2003). Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Hichem Naar (2015). Subject‐Relative Reasons for Love. Ratio 29 (1).
Florian Cova, Julien Deonna & David Sander (2015). Introduction: Moral Emotions. Topoi 34 (2):397-400.
Aaron Smuts (2014). Normative Reasons for Love, Part I. Philosophy Compass 9 (8):507-517.
Similar books and articles
Troy A. Jollimore (2011). Love's Vision. Princeton University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A Secret History. Yale University Press.
S. Matthew Liao (2006). The Idea of a Duty to Love. Journal of Value Inquiry 40 (1):1-22.
Carolyn Price (2012). What is the Point of Love? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2):217-237.
Bennett W. Helm, Love. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Christopher Grau (2010). Love and History. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):246-271.
Joseph Clair (2013). Wolterstorff on Love and Justice. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):138-167.
Sharon Krishek (2008). Two Forms of Love: The Problem of Preferential Love in Kierkegaard's Works of Love. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):595-617.
Marguerite La Caze (2005). Love, That Indispensable Supplement: Irigaray and Kant on Love and Respect. Hypatia 20 (3):92-114.
Roger E. Lamb (ed.) (1997). Love Analyzed. Westview Press.
Added to index2012-08-02
Total downloads109 ( #33,562 of 1,790,571 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #83,896 of 1,790,571 )
How can I increase my downloads?