Leibniz on the Greatest Number and the Greatest Being

The Leibniz Review 15:49-66 (2005)
In notes from 1675-76 Leibniz is using the notion of an infinite number as an illustration of an impossible notion. In the same notes, he is also using this notion in contrast to the possibility of the ‘Ens perfectissumum’ (A.6.3 572; Pk 91; A.6.3 325). I suggest that Leibniz’s concern about the possibility of the notion of ‘the greatest or the most perfect being’ is partly motivated by his observation that similar notions, such as ‘the greatest number’, are impossible. This leads to the question how Leibniz convinced himself that the notion of the greatest number is self-contradictory and that of the greatest being is not. I consider two suggestions, one that stress the difference between beings and numbers and one that stress the difference between two notions of infinity, and conclude that neither of them provides a satisfactory solution to this question.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/leibniz2005151
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Adam Harmer (2014). Leibniz on Infinite Numbers, Infinite Wholes, and Composite Substances. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2):236-259.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Rupert Read (2011). The Difference Principle is Not Action-Guiding. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):487-503.
Albert Camus (2001). Democracy is an Exercise in Modesty. Sartre Studies International 7 (2):12-14.
Ohad Nachtomy (2012). Leibniz and Kant on Possibility and Existence. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):953-972.
Anderson Woods (1925). The Greatest Happiness Regardless of Number. International Journal of Ethics 35 (4):413-425.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

7 ( #291,913 of 1,725,417 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #134,582 of 1,725,417 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.