Antecapere ergo sum: what price knowledge? [Book Review]

AI and Society 28 (1):39-50 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the age of ubiquitous technology, humans are reshaped through each transaction they are involved in. AI-driven networks, online games, and multisensory interactive environments make up alternate realities. Within such alternate worlds, users are reshaped as deterministic agents. Technology’s focus on reducing complexity leads to a human being dependent on prediction-driven machines and behaving like them. Meaning and information are disconnected. Existence is reduced to energy processes. The immense gain in efficiency translates as prosperity. Citizens of advanced economies, hurrying in the rhythm of machine-driven interactions, feel entitled to it. Successful at the price of self-awareness, they no longer know what this means. Happiness and prosperity are not consubstantial. Lack of happiness leads to aggression. This is the image of the world as we see it, no longer looking at each other, eye to eye, but screen to screen. The questions eliminated in the process of transferring responsibility from the individual to machines will inevitably become society’s new focus. When the goal is to get everyone to behave like a machine, the Singularity hypothesis becomes self-fulfilling prophecy. If, in addition to having exhausted natural resources, society does not want to end up making the human mind superfluous, it has to seek a better understanding of what makes anticipation possible. As a definitory characteristic of the living, corresponding to its complexity, anticipation can no longer be taken for granted, while every effort is made to reduce complexity for efficiency’s sake. Awareness of the processes conducive to its expression in successful human action will position human beings as masters of their destiny, not slaves of their own making. Antecapere ergo sum might be the counterclaim to Descartes’ Dubito ergo sum . To resist being perfected into oblivion, that is, unsustainable prosperity, means to reclaim the knowledge corresponding to higher levels of complexity

Similar books and articles

Cogito, ergo sum and sum res cogitans.James D. Carney - 1962 - Philosophical Review 71 (4):492-496.
Descartes: A Study of His Philosophy.Anthony Kenny (ed.) - 1968 - South Bend, Ind.: St. Augustine's Press.
Cogito, Ergo Sum.W. von Leyden - 1963 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 63:67 - 82.
`Cogito ergo sum'.W. Geo Davies - 1877 - Mind 2 (7):412-413.
Cogito, Ergo Sum.A. J. Ayer - 1953 - Analysis 14 (2):27 - 31.
Cogito Ergo Sum: The Life of Rene Descartes (review).Patrick Gerard Henry - 2002 - Philosophy and Literature 26 (2):465-468.
Cogito, ergo sum.Robert Grimm - 1965 - Theoria 31 (3):159-173.
Cogito Ergo Sum.Juke James - 2008 - Philosophy Now 69:20-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-22

Downloads
309 (#63,020)

6 months
76 (#56,750)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mihai Nadin
University of Texas at Dallas

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Minds and Machines.Hilary Putnam - 1960 - In Sidney Hook (ed.), Dimensions Of Mind: A Symposium. NY: NEW YORK University Press. pp. 138-164.
Are We Living in a Computer Simulation?Nick Bostrom - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):243-255.
Are We Living in a Computer Simulation?Nick Bostrom - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):243-255.
Are we living in a computer simulation?By Nick Bostrom - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):243–255.

View all 21 references / Add more references