David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind and Language 24 (5):495-522 (2009)
It is a common assumption among both philosophers and psychologists that having accurate beliefs about ourselves and the world around us is always the epistemic gold standard. However, there is gathering data from social psychology that suggest that illusions are quite prevalent in our everyday thinking and that some of these illusions may even be conducive to our overall well being. In this paper, we explore the relevance of these so-called 'positive illusions' to the free will debate. More specifically, we use the literature on positive illusions as a springboard for examining Saul Smilansky 's so-called 'free will illusionism '. At the end of the day, we will use data from both social and developmental psychology concerning perceived control to try to show that his view is on shaky empirical footing
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard E. Nisbett & Lee Ross (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Prentice-Hall.
Eddy Nahmias, Stephen G. Morris, Thomas Nadelhoffer & Jason Turner (2005). Surveying Freedom: Folk Intuitions About Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Psychology 18 (5):561-584.
Eddy Nahmias, Stephen G. Morris, Thomas Nadelhoffer & Jason Turner (2006). Is Incompatibilism Intuitive? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):28 - 53.
Saul Smilansky (2000). Free Will and Illusion. Oxford University Press.
Eddy A. Nahmias (2006). Folk Fears About Freedom and Responsibility: Determinism Vs. Reductionism. Journal of Cognition and Culture 6 (1-2):215-237.
Citations of this work BETA
Finn Spicer (2010). Cultural Variations in Folk Epistemic Intuitions. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (4):515-529.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Nadelhoffer (2007). Folk Intuitions, Slippery Slopes, and Necessary Fictions : An Essay on Saul Smilansky's Free Will Illusionism. In Peter A. French & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Philosophy and the Empirical. Blackwell Pub. Inc. 202–213.
Carlos E. Vasco (2000). The Illusions of Scientists Vs. The Illusions of Social Epistemologists. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):343-351.
E. C. (2000). The Illusions of Scientists Vs. The Illusions of Social Epistemologists. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):343-351.
Anne-Marie Brouwer, Eli Brenner & Jeroen B. J. Smeets (2004). Using the Same Information for Planning and Control is Compatible with the Dynamic Illusion Effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):28-29.
J. J. C. Smart (2006). Metaphysical Illusions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):167 – 175.
Eldon C. Wait (1997). Dissipating Illusions. Human Studies 20 (2):221-242.
Keith Frankish (2009). Adaptive Misbelief or Judicious Pragmatic Acceptance? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):520.
Evelyn Brister (2008). Harold Kincaid, John Dupré, and Alison Wylie, Eds., Value-Free Science? Ideals and Illusions. [REVIEW] Ethics 118 (4):735-738.
David A. Jopling (1996). “Take Away the Life-Lie … “: Positive Illusions and Creative Self-Deception. Philosophical Psychology 9 (4):525 – 544.
Added to index2009-02-09
Total downloads76 ( #47,365 of 1,780,627 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #107,025 of 1,780,627 )
How can I increase my downloads?