Prescription Versus Description in Philosophy of Science, or Methodology Versus History: a Critical Assessment
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphilosophy 17 (4):289-299 (1986)
This paper examines critically the current state of affairs in philosophy of science. It focuses on the well-Known puzzle about the relationship between the normative prescriptive methodology of science and positive descriptive history of science. This puzzle has dogged philosophers of science for over a generation and is still controversial. My conclusion is that there is really no escape from it. The best way to characterize it is as follows: "philosophy of science without history of science is empty; history of science without philosophy of science is blind."
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Nader Chokr (1993). Replies to Critics. Social Epistemology 7 (4):369 – 386.
Similar books and articles
Eike Haberland (1971). Adolf Bastian's Conception of Cultural History. Systematization and Description of the Theory and Method with an Attempted Assessment of the Cultural Historic Content on This Basis. Philosophy and History 4 (2):205-205.
Imre Lakatos (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge University Press.
Dimitri Ginev (1992). Varianten der Kritischen Wissenschaftstheorie. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 23 (1):45 - 60.
Donald A. Wells (1950). Description and Prescription in Value Judgments. Journal of Philosophy 47 (15):434-438.
Roger Ariew (1986). Descartes as Critic of Galileo's Scientific Methodology. Synthese 67 (1):77 - 90.
Konrad Fuchs (1986). The Central Eastern Front in June '44. Description, Assessment, Lessons. Philosophy and History 19 (1):69-70.
B. Theunissen (2000). Turning Refracting Into a Science: F. C. Donders' 'Scientific Reform' of Lens Prescription. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 31 (4):557-578.
Azari͡a Prizenti Polikarov (1983). Methodological Problems of Science: The Iteration Cycle: Science--Methodology of Science. Pub. House of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
Raphael Sassower (2005). Science and Culture. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (4):499-508.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads6 ( #211,862 of 1,100,145 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #127,215 of 1,100,145 )
How can I increase my downloads?