Prescription vs description in the philosophy of science, or methodology vs history: A critical assessment
Metaphilosophy 17 (4):289-299 (1986)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesEike Haberland (1971). Adolf Bastian's Conception of Cultural History. Systematization and Description of the Theory and Method with an Attempted Assessment of the Cultural Historic Content on This Basis. Philosophy and History 4 (2):205-205.
Azari͡a Prizenti Polikarov (1983). Methodological Problems of Science: The Iteration Cycle: Science--Methodology of Science. Pub. House of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
B. Theunissen (2000). Turning Refracting Into a Science: F. C. Donders' 'Scientific Reform' of Lens Prescription. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 31 (4):557-578.
Konrad Fuchs (1986). The Central Eastern Front in June '44. Description, Assessment, Lessons. Philosophy and History 19 (1):69-70.
Roger Ariew (1986). Descartes as Critic of Galileo's Scientific Methodology. Synthese 67 (1):77 - 90.
Donald A. Wells (1950). Description and Prescription in Value Judgments. Journal of Philosophy 47 (15):434-438.
Dimitri Ginev (1992). Varianten der Kritischen Wissenschaftstheorie. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 23 (1):45 - 60.
Imre Lakatos (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge University Press.
Raphael Sassower (2005). Science and Culture. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (4):499-508.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads3 ( #202,107 of 550,917 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,917 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
